<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Politics Summary: Tuesday, September 29th</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftfootforward.org/2009/09/politics-summary-tuesday-september-29th/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2009/09/politics-summary-tuesday-september-29th/</link>
	<description>Left Foot Forward is a political blog for progressives. We provide evidence-based analysis on British politics, news and policy developments.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rory</title>
		<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2009/09/politics-summary-tuesday-september-29th/comment-page-1/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>Rory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=1605#comment-404</guid>
		<description>&#039;No paper reports how the policy is consistent with rapidly bringing down Britain’s debt.&#039; Because presumably they will cut spending in other areas. 

If you disagree with this on ideological grounds, fair enough, but if you are going to make jibes about &#039;inconsistency&#039; you should at least apply the same standards to the Labour Party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;No paper reports how the policy is consistent with rapidly bringing down Britain’s debt.&#8217; Because presumably they will cut spending in other areas. </p>
<p>If you disagree with this on ideological grounds, fair enough, but if you are going to make jibes about &#8216;inconsistency&#8217; you should at least apply the same standards to the Labour Party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

