We have this already. They’re called “schools”.

Housing – how would you prevent home ownership? Make people forfeit their properties. Sounds a bit like communism to me.

Social Mobility Revolution – Grammar schools provided social mobility – admittedly some people were pigeonholed to other technical schols, but the gifted poor were educated in excellent schools which could nurture academic ability allowing entrance to university (funded through grants system). Labour is fundamentally against social mobility because if someone moves up then someone else is moving down, and that is terrible unless they are a baby eating tory.

Youthstart – I have always believed that we should make more use of that assets we already have. How many school buildings are sat empty at night and in holidays. Why not use these? From what I know of Kids having been involved in youth work, only a small minority of secondary age kids would voluntarily attend. Most wouldnt be seen dead somewhere like you describe.

I particularly like the detail of using explicit reallocation of funding from other areas. This would make explicit that no new taxes were in the offing (important in this election where cuts are the master narrative), but most importantly the explicit reference to a past policy shows the workings, as it were, giving the policy both motive and direction. This would be a powerful election time statement when for so long the appearance has been of an intellectual vacuum from which policy appears like a rabbit out of a hat.

There is one policy I would add to these! I will post it soon.