Tory plans to slash NHS bureaucracy raise more questions than answers
Andrew Lansley this week delivered his vision for saving money in the NHS – namely by claiming the Tories would slash a third off the administrative costs within the NHS. Primary Care Trusts, Strategic Health Authorities (SHAs), and even the Department of Health would not be spared.
The Tories have calculated that the annual cost of “NHS bureaucracy” is £4.38 billion. They say this is made up of £2.14bn for PCT running costs, £1.94bn for the cost of quangos, £200 million for Department of Health running costs, and £100m for SHA running costs.
Mr Lansley added that by the end of its fourth year in power the Conservative government would have cut spending on bureaucracy by a third to £3bn a year.
However Richard Vize of the Health Service Journal writes that the Shadow Health Secretary’s approach is an “oversimplification” and is nowhere near the £20bn of savings required in the Service. This figure is put forward by David Nicholson, Chief Executive of the NHS.
He continues that with £1.5bn saved in administration costs over four years and £1bn from a public sector pay freeze he will still be the small matter of £17.5bn short. The real question therefore has to be what further cuts will be involved and more importantly what will happen to frontline services.
Management savings may be necessary, but there is a link between frontline services and the support staff that make their delivery possible. Doctors and nurses cannot provide a quality service without the real people who very often do the most mundane but vital tasks-making appointments, managing theatres and running sterile stores department.
The McKinsey Report, which recommended closing 137,000 clinical and admin posts by 2014 to save £20 bn, was rejected by Labour. Does Mr Lansley intend to take on these recommendations and are his plans for admin cuts an indication of what is in store for frontline services? This is the real question.
-
Naz Bashir
YouGov Tracker
ToUChstone Economic Tracker
George’s Marvellous Deficit Calculator
Most read this week
- Climate change sceptics and rural romantics – the Tories are a shambles on renewable energy
- As order breaks down in Syria, its Christians suffer the consequences
- Amidst the burning flesh of Homs, Syrians plead: “We are getting slaughtered, save us”
- Don’t believe the spin – the health reforms are Cameron’s just as much as Lansley’s
- The shocking effect of Gove’s EMA axe: Youngsters skipping food to get to college
Best of the web
Top issues
Left Foot Facebook
Awards & Rankings
Archive
Tag Cloud
Domestic Progressives
- A Thousand Cuts
- Alastair Campbell
- Andrew Gibson's Blog
- Anthony Painter
- Ayes To The Left
- Blackburn Labour Party
- Chartist
- Conor's Commentary
- Dave's Part
- Diary of a Benefit Scrounger
- Duncan's Economic Blog
- Follow my leaders
- Freemania
- Full Fact
- Go Fourth
- Good Animal / Bad Animal
- Guardian Politics blog
- Harry's Place
- Hopi Sen
- Institute for Government
- Intelligence Squared
- Labour and Capital
- Labour Home
- Labour List
- LabourHome
- Left Central
- Lib-Con Trick
- Liberal Conspiracy
- Liberal Democrat Voice
- LSE politics blog
- Luke's blog
- Mark Thompson Blog
- Matthew Taylor's blog
- Max Atkinson's blog
- Migrants' Rights Network
- New Statesman: free speech
- Next Left
- Nick Pearce
- OurKingdom
- Patrick Bury's blog
- Policy Critical
- Political Reboot
- Political Scrapbook
- Progress
- Red Brick
- RSA Projects
- Runnymede Trust
- Rupa Huq's Blog
- Sadie's Tavern
- Save EMA
- Shamik Das
- Slinger blog
- Tank the Tories
- Tax Research UK
- The Centre Left
- The Green Benches
- The Novocastrian
- This is my truth
- Tim McLoughlin
- Tom Harris MP
- Tom Watson MP
- Touchstone
- Touchstone TUC blog
- Young Fabians Blog







