<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1980s recession was worse for young people</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftfootforward.org/2009/12/1980s-recession-was-worse-for-young-people/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2009/12/1980s-recession-was-worse-for-young-people/</link>
	<description>Left Foot Forward is a political blog for progressives. We provide evidence-based analysis on British politics, news and policy developments.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vital extension of support for young people &#124; ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC</title>
		<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2009/12/1980s-recession-was-worse-for-young-people/comment-page-1/#comment-12172</link>
		<dc:creator>Vital extension of support for young people &#124; ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=5320#comment-12172</guid>
		<description>[...] unemployment, and to far lower numbers of young people being out of work and education than in previous recessions. It remains to be seen whether other parties will promise to match this key committment. Related [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] unemployment, and to far lower numbers of young people being out of work and education than in previous recessions. It remains to be seen whether other parties will promise to match this key committment. Related [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Highest youth unemployment &#8220;since records began&#8221; or not as the case might be &#124; ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC</title>
		<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2009/12/1980s-recession-was-worse-for-young-people/comment-page-1/#comment-3494</link>
		<dc:creator>Highest youth unemployment &#8220;since records began&#8221; or not as the case might be &#124; ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=5320#comment-3494</guid>
		<description>[...] that the current set of statistics started in 1992, but reliable data goes back to 1984 as Nicola has [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that the current set of statistics started in 1992, but reliable data goes back to 1984 as Nicola has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Osborne calls for "honest debate" while manipulating the facts &#124; Left Foot Forward</title>
		<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2009/12/1980s-recession-was-worse-for-young-people/comment-page-1/#comment-3396</link>
		<dc:creator>Osborne calls for "honest debate" while manipulating the facts &#124; Left Foot Forward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=5320#comment-3396</guid>
		<description>[...] as this blog pointed out last week, records only began in 1992 while the 1980s recession was far worse for young [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as this blog pointed out last week, records only began in 1992 while the 1980s recession was far worse for young [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swagata</title>
		<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2009/12/1980s-recession-was-worse-for-young-people/comment-page-1/#comment-3140</link>
		<dc:creator>Swagata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=5320#comment-3140</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad you see the improvements since the 1980s, after all that was a quarter of a century ago. I suspect the schemes on offer in 1985 were an improvement on those in 1960, and that those in 1960 were superior to 1935 etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad you see the improvements since the 1980s, after all that was a quarter of a century ago. I suspect the schemes on offer in 1985 were an improvement on those in 1960, and that those in 1960 were superior to 1935 etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicola Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2009/12/1980s-recession-was-worse-for-young-people/comment-page-1/#comment-3139</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicola Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=5320#comment-3139</guid>
		<description>Thanks all for the comments. I absolutely agree there are real problems for young people in the labour market just now - while we welcome increased levels of training, poorer progression opportunities for young people with lower skills and a reduction in jobs in the middle of the income spectrum are real concerns  for the TUC, as are increasing levels of household debt and reduced security at work. 

But I also think it&#039;s important to recognise that policy responses now are a significant improvement on those we saw in the 1980s. A paid job that incorporates training opportunities with experience is some distance away from a YTS scheme, and there is evidence to suggest that Government policy is playing at least a part in limiting the extent of the increases we&#039;ve seen in unemployment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks all for the comments. I absolutely agree there are real problems for young people in the labour market just now &#8211; while we welcome increased levels of training, poorer progression opportunities for young people with lower skills and a reduction in jobs in the middle of the income spectrum are real concerns  for the TUC, as are increasing levels of household debt and reduced security at work. </p>
<p>But I also think it&#8217;s important to recognise that policy responses now are a significant improvement on those we saw in the 1980s. A paid job that incorporates training opportunities with experience is some distance away from a YTS scheme, and there is evidence to suggest that Government policy is playing at least a part in limiting the extent of the increases we&#8217;ve seen in unemployment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Youth unemployment, now vs the 80s &#124; ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC</title>
		<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2009/12/1980s-recession-was-worse-for-young-people/comment-page-1/#comment-3138</link>
		<dc:creator>Youth unemployment, now vs the 80s &#124; ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=5320#comment-3138</guid>
		<description>[...] unemployment, now vs the 80s  Posted at 4:30 pm on 15 Dec 09 by Nicola Smith   I’ve written a guest post at Left Foot Forward today – looking at what is happening with youth unemployment now compared to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] unemployment, now vs the 80s  Posted at 4:30 pm on 15 Dec 09 by Nicola Smith   I’ve written a guest post at Left Foot Forward today – looking at what is happening with youth unemployment now compared to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: willstraw</title>
		<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2009/12/1980s-recession-was-worse-for-young-people/comment-page-1/#comment-3126</link>
		<dc:creator>willstraw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=5320#comment-3126</guid>
		<description>Well said, Anon.

Tim - What&#039;s so disgraceful? Pointing out that things were worse in the 1980s or saying that this is no excuse for complacency?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, Anon.</p>
<p>Tim &#8211; What&#8217;s so disgraceful? Pointing out that things were worse in the 1980s or saying that this is no excuse for complacency?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon E Mouse</title>
		<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2009/12/1980s-recession-was-worse-for-young-people/comment-page-1/#comment-3125</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon E Mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=5320#comment-3125</guid>
		<description>Tim Connor - It&#039;s called open debate - free speech and if you think this is &quot;Really vile&quot; you need to develop a thicker skin.

I assume Nicola Smith must know her stuff - it says she is the Senior Policy Officer at the TUC - so before you disagree with her outright, why don&#039;t you try posting something more constructive than your comments which really are just how you feel about an article.

What contribution to this blog do your criticisms make really? Personally I think this woman raises some interesting points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim Connor &#8211; It&#8217;s called open debate &#8211; free speech and if you think this is &#8220;Really vile&#8221; you need to develop a thicker skin.</p>
<p>I assume Nicola Smith must know her stuff &#8211; it says she is the Senior Policy Officer at the TUC &#8211; so before you disagree with her outright, why don&#8217;t you try posting something more constructive than your comments which really are just how you feel about an article.</p>
<p>What contribution to this blog do your criticisms make really? Personally I think this woman raises some interesting points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CVRepublic</title>
		<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2009/12/1980s-recession-was-worse-for-young-people/comment-page-1/#comment-7441</link>
		<dc:creator>CVRepublic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=5320#comment-7441</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;1980s recession was worse for young people (Left Foot Forward) http://url4.eu/w49M&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">1980s recession was worse for young people (Left Foot Forward) <a href="http://url4.eu/w49M" rel="nofollow">http://url4.eu/w49M</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swagata</title>
		<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2009/12/1980s-recession-was-worse-for-young-people/comment-page-1/#comment-3119</link>
		<dc:creator>Swagata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=5320#comment-3119</guid>
		<description>The young always get messed with. In the 1980s it was pointless YTA schemes, today it&#039;s debt-laden degree courses. And that&#039;s before people start work. Thanks to the UK&#039;s supremely flexible labour market, when some find work it can be part-time or even the disgraceful &quot;zero hours contract&quot; (google it!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The young always get messed with. In the 1980s it was pointless YTA schemes, today it&#8217;s debt-laden degree courses. And that&#8217;s before people start work. Thanks to the UK&#8217;s supremely flexible labour market, when some find work it can be part-time or even the disgraceful &#8220;zero hours contract&#8221; (google it!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

