I have never known a time when a government is so out of touch with the electorate – how thick are the walls on Browns bunker?

The Labour Party are sleepwalking into opposition and no one seems able to see it. Perhaps it’s because they’re frightened of being on the receiving end of a flying Nokia cell phone from Brown or that bully Liam Byrne.

Instead of this site spending it’s time spouting drivel about whether or not Spain is in the G20, it should start acting for the benefit of the Labour Party and listen to critics like me.

Can you imagine an activist knocking on the door of a voter to try to persuade them to vote Labour at the election? Good luck….

You give the PBR an “average” score against your red lines, but do you and others in the Labour Party really want 5 more years of Brown?

Do you really think Gordon Brown is the right person to fix the British economy?

Says everything about the trustworthiness of this lot.

I notice: “One scientist told The Times he felt under pressure to sign. “The Met Office is a major employer of scientists and has long had a policy of only appointing and working with those who subscribe to their views on man-made global warming,” he said.”

Which fully illustrates my point about not trusting any of the scientists on the payroll. The old adage, “well they would say that, wouldn’t they” springs to mind.

The disgraceful wording of the “Norwegian Text” to cripple the poor by richer nations (again) and the “Climategate” dishonesty from these heretics means the sooner this whole waste of time and taxes is over the better.

Perhaps one of LFF’s regular contributors to the blog, Rupert Read for example, would care to answer the charge that it is OK for richer nations to punish the poor of the world and treat them in an inequitable manner.

Personally I do not believe the end justifies the means and wish the richer nations would work together to help the poor of the world instead of penalising them so openly. This whole thing stinks. Shame on those ‘delegates’.