Comments on: Today’s surprise employment stats should be treated with caution

By: Rebounding labour market no excuse for triumphalism | Left Foot Forward

Rebounding labour market no excuse for triumphalism | Left Foot Forward — Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:05:20 +0000

[...] that it would rise. Extrapolating out the data – using the methodology employed by Graeme Cooke on this blog – reveals that between October and November ILO unemployment actually fell by [...]

By: Paul

Paul — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:26:04 +0000

Isn’t the ONS data seasonally adjusted anyway? Or are you working with the raw data (can’t be botherd to look it up).

By: CVRepublic

CVRepublic — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:57:30 +0000

Today’s surprise employment stats should be treated with caution (Left Foot Forward) http://url4.eu/weg4

By: Jason Monastra

Jason Monastra — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:17:59 +0000

Today's surprise employment stats should be treated with caution …: The JSA claimant count fell in Novemb.. http://bit.ly/5iRZPy

By: Jonathan Taylor

Jonathan Taylor — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:33:16 +0000

RT @leftfootfwd Labour can take credit for the surprise employment stats but they should still be treated with caution http://bit.ly/7Szqsv

By: Labour market interventions reduce real cost of recession | Left Foot Forward

Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:30:48 +0000

[...] the day when unemployment surprisingly fell, the Express have a particularly pernicious story about how ‘Benefits cost families £20 a [...]

By: Ellie Gellard

Ellie Gellard — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:12:24 +0000

RT @leftfootfwd Labour can take credit for the surprise employment stats but they should still be treated with caution http://bit.ly/7Szqsv

By: CVRepublic

CVRepublic — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:10:54 +0000

Today's surprise employment stats should be treated with caution … http://url4.eu/warp