Published by , February 22nd 2010 at 12:04 pm
Cameron overclaims party’s online engagement
Speaking at Stephan Shakespeare’s Post-Bureaucratic Age conference this morning in east London, David Cameron exaggerated the amount of engagement in the party’s manifesto process by a factor of 25.
In answer to a question from the audience about his party’s use of online tools, Cameron said:
“We had 150,000 people voting online [on our draft manifesto] … I think you’d be surprised if 100,000 normally read a manifesto.”
But the Conservative’s own website show that this is a huge exaggeration. The party has received:
• 6,881 votes from 521 people on transparent government;
• 29,161 votes from 1,326 people on the economy;
• 36,180 votes from 1,546 people on education; and
• 40,002 votes from 2,606 people on the NHS.
In total, 5,999 people have voted 112,224 times, an average of 18 times each. Cameron’s claim was out by a factor of 25.
This isn’t the first time that the Tories have been questioned for over-claiming the amount of engagement in their online manifesto process. Last month, Will Heaven wrote on his Telegraph blog, “The Conservatives are playing a dangerous game with their draft manifesto”
“Last week, David Cameron was asked just 1,109 questions about the NHS by 2,612 people, who rated other people’s questions 40,000 times (needless to say, it’s that last figure you’ll hear the most about). This week there’s no improvement. David Cameron is taking questions on education, but has so far received only 631 questions from 1,364 people, who have rated other questions 32,749 times.
Blog Poll 2010
Best of the web
Awards & Rankings
Archive
Domestic Progressives
- A Thousand Cuts
- Alastair Campbell
- Anthony Painter
- Blackburn Labour Party
- Conor's Commentary
- Dave's Part
- Duncan's Economic Blog
- Freemania
- Go Fourth
- Guardian Politics blog
- Harry's Place
- Hopi Sen
- Labour and Capital
- LabourHome
- LabourList
- Lib-Con Trick
- Liberal Conspiracy
- Liberal Democrat Voice
- LSE politics blog
- Luke's blog
- Mark Reckons
- Matthew Taylor's blog
- Next Left
- New Statesman: free speech
- The Novocastrian
- OurKingdom
- Policy Critical
- Political Scrapbook
- Progress
- RSA Projects
- Runnymede Trust
- Shamik Das
- Slinger blog
- Tank the Tories
- Tax Research UK
- This is my truth
- Tim McLoughlin
- Tom Harris MP
- Tom Watson MP
- Touchstone TUC blog
- Young Fabians Blog
Global Progressives
Climate Progressives
It seems miscounting is endemic amongst tories – they can’t count teenage mums, their poster boy Iain Dale can’t count his own readers and now this. If I’d spent thousands of pounds on a public school education like Cameron’s parents, I’d be asking for my money back.
ian – Nice one! : – )
Plus they also have a problem with decimal points and analysing statistics! They would just be great with the economy!
The Typical Tories, always the hunters of hysteria, and headlines. It’s a shame the mainstream media has lost its touch, and forgot what investigative journalism is. If journalists actually did their jobs, instead of chasing the money (i.e. ratings, selling papers) then we would have a more representative and un biased media.
You can only dream.
After ToryBear tweeted that “Tories say sod twitter” and that the Tories “get” social media, I went to the Cameron MSN chat last week. The video has a helpful count listing how many people were watching. The count never went above 220. I tweeted ToryBear to congratulate him that since he has 2400 followers he is ten times more popular than Dave. ToryBear didn’t care to comment.
Very interesting.
As has been shown, the Tories not only don’t understand how to set up online engagement, they also don’t know how to make it work once it’s there. MyConservatives failed miserably to deliver on all counts, as exposed at http://bit.ly/MyCon
Oh no! Don't tell me we've been caught out again (yikes): http://bit.ly/dBZl5p
RT @mydavidcameron: Cameron overclaims party’s online engagement http://bit.ly/dBZl5p < Interesting article and comments on @leftfootfwd
RT @mydavidcameron: Cameron overclaims party’s online engagement http://bit.ly/dBZl5p < Interesting article and comments on @leftfootfwd
RT @SamTarry: RT @mydavidcameron: Cameron overclaims party’s online engagement http://bit.ly/dBZl5p < Interesting article and comments on @leftfootfwd
RT: @mydavidcameron: Cameron overclaims party’s online engagement http://bit.ly/dBZl5p < #torymaths
RT @mydavidcameron: Cameron overclaims party’s online engagement http://bit.ly/dBZl5p < Interesting article and comments on @leftfootfwd
RT @uklabour: More dodgy stats from the Tories – http://bit.ly/a9Brwk
RT @mydavidcameron Cameron overclaims party’s online engagement http://bit.ly/dBZl5p < Interesting article and comments on @leftfootfwd
[...] numbers. And unlike the promotion for Irish stout, some of the figures in the video were actually used by what purports to be a serious political [...]