<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Campaign launched to commit UK to spending 0.7% of income on development aid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftfootforward.org/2010/02/campaign-launched-to-commit-britain-to-spending-0-point-7-per-cent-of-national-income-on-development-aid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2010/02/campaign-launched-to-commit-britain-to-spending-0-point-7-per-cent-of-national-income-on-development-aid/</link>
	<description>Left Foot Forward is a political blog for progressives. We provide evidence-based analysis on British politics, news and policy developments.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 07:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tories delay enshrining 0.7% target in law. Again. When will they legislate? &#124; Left Foot Forward</title>
		<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2010/02/campaign-launched-to-commit-britain-to-spending-0-point-7-per-cent-of-national-income-on-development-aid/comment-page-1/#comment-158077</link>
		<dc:creator>Tories delay enshrining 0.7% target in law. Again. When will they legislate? &#124; Left Foot Forward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 08:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=7508#comment-158077</guid>
		<description>[...] Campaign launched to commit UK to spending 0.7% of income on development aid &#8211; David Taylor, February 3rd 2010    Share  &#124; Permalink  &#124; Leave a comment          /*        [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Campaign launched to commit UK to spending 0.7% of income on development aid &#8211; David Taylor, February 3rd 2010    Share  | Permalink  | Leave a comment          /*        [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaun</title>
		<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2010/02/campaign-launched-to-commit-britain-to-spending-0-point-7-per-cent-of-national-income-on-development-aid/comment-page-1/#comment-17305</link>
		<dc:creator>shaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 06:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=7508#comment-17305</guid>
		<description>so lets see 0.7 thats about the same monies as the total welfare bill costs the UK each year
ohhh and what do the poor the unemployable and the sick get?
just hate hate hate in the media and Govt telling them work or starve
Funny old world 
 helping the poor abroad but whipping the poor back home
Its akin to taking a sandwhich from a begger in the street in Uk and psoting it to another begger abroad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so lets see 0.7 thats about the same monies as the total welfare bill costs the UK each year<br />
ohhh and what do the poor the unemployable and the sick get?<br />
just hate hate hate in the media and Govt telling them work or starve<br />
Funny old world<br />
 helping the poor abroad but whipping the poor back home<br />
Its akin to taking a sandwhich from a begger in the street in Uk and psoting it to another begger abroad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon E Mouse</title>
		<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2010/02/campaign-launched-to-commit-britain-to-spending-0-point-7-per-cent-of-national-income-on-development-aid/comment-page-1/#comment-5440</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon E Mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 14:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=7508#comment-5440</guid>
		<description>Tim - Good point - it&#039;s probably more put that way....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim &#8211; Good point &#8211; it&#8217;s probably more put that way&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Worstall</title>
		<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2010/02/campaign-launched-to-commit-britain-to-spending-0-point-7-per-cent-of-national-income-on-development-aid/comment-page-1/#comment-5439</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Worstall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 13:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=7508#comment-5439</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;ll find that we already contribute 0.7%.

It&#039;s just that we don&#039;t contribute 0.,7% through government....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;ll find that we already contribute 0.7%.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just that we don&#8217;t contribute 0.,7% through government&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon E Mouse</title>
		<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2010/02/campaign-launched-to-commit-britain-to-spending-0-point-7-per-cent-of-national-income-on-development-aid/comment-page-1/#comment-5423</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon E Mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=7508#comment-5423</guid>
		<description>Liz - Last comment on this. Just heard on R5 Live that personal and businesses going under are at an all time record high for the last quarter.

Still want to describe Browns handling of the economy as masterful?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liz &#8211; Last comment on this. Just heard on R5 Live that personal and businesses going under are at an all time record high for the last quarter.</p>
<p>Still want to describe Browns handling of the economy as masterful?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon E Mouse</title>
		<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2010/02/campaign-launched-to-commit-britain-to-spending-0-point-7-per-cent-of-national-income-on-development-aid/comment-page-1/#comment-5411</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon E Mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 17:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=7508#comment-5411</guid>
		<description>Liz - No other developed country on the planet is in the debt we&#039;re in yet have you forgot Brown said we were &quot;best placed to lead the world into recovery&quot;.

Running a small business myself I understand more than most the mess we&#039;re in.

Still waiting to hear you justify Gurkha&#039;s, 10p tax and the like - just want to see if you think those actions aren&#039;t &quot;nasty&quot; ; - )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liz &#8211; No other developed country on the planet is in the debt we&#8217;re in yet have you forgot Brown said we were &#8220;best placed to lead the world into recovery&#8221;.</p>
<p>Running a small business myself I understand more than most the mess we&#8217;re in.</p>
<p>Still waiting to hear you justify Gurkha&#8217;s, 10p tax and the like &#8211; just want to see if you think those actions aren&#8217;t &#8220;nasty&#8221; ; &#8211; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz McShane</title>
		<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2010/02/campaign-launched-to-commit-britain-to-spending-0-point-7-per-cent-of-national-income-on-development-aid/comment-page-1/#comment-5402</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz McShane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=7508#comment-5402</guid>
		<description>Anon - given that this recession was much worse than ones in the 80s and 90s and was more difficult to navigate given the global nature of business &amp; high finance these days, it is quite an achievement that we have had less unemployment, fewer house repossessions and small business closures - that is quite an important fact and one that you seem happy to ignore!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon &#8211; given that this recession was much worse than ones in the 80s and 90s and was more difficult to navigate given the global nature of business &amp; high finance these days, it is quite an achievement that we have had less unemployment, fewer house repossessions and small business closures &#8211; that is quite an important fact and one that you seem happy to ignore!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon E Mouse</title>
		<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2010/02/campaign-launched-to-commit-britain-to-spending-0-point-7-per-cent-of-national-income-on-development-aid/comment-page-1/#comment-5399</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon E Mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=7508#comment-5399</guid>
		<description>Liz - &quot;Masterful handling of the economy&quot;...

Labour is doooooomed...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liz &#8211; &#8220;Masterful handling of the economy&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>Labour is doooooomed&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon E Mouse</title>
		<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2010/02/campaign-launched-to-commit-britain-to-spending-0-point-7-per-cent-of-national-income-on-development-aid/comment-page-1/#comment-5398</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon E Mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=7508#comment-5398</guid>
		<description>Liz - The general point I make and the one you seem unwilling to answer, is that the nasty party is now Labour and not the Tories and you brought this up not me!

The Tories were over a decade ago - old story.

Labour do not help the weak and needy - 10p tax removal - nasty.
Labour try to take compensation from our injured soldiers - nasty.
Labour remove the funding to properly equip our soldiers - nasty.
Labour arrest 86 year old Walter Wolfgang under the Terrorism Act - nasty.

I could go on and list dozens of similar &quot;nasty&quot; actions by this party even without mentioning the gap between the rich and poor increasing or telling lies about overseas wars.

I have no particular obsession with that useless bully Gordon Brown or the way he treats people in his own party (Peter Watt, Tony Blair, David Miliband etc) I just think that if more people like me were listened to and less unacceptable behaviour was accepted we could put a case to the British people for re-election.

By ignoring (so far you haven&#039;t even given your opinion on any of my points eg Camerons son Ivan, 10p tax, Gurkha&#039;s)the way Brown and his cohorts behave, what you are doing Liz is telling the party leadership that it is OK to continue like that.

Well it isn&#039;t OK Liz and should have been stopped by having a general election after Brown forced Blair out. His behaviour was underhand and despicable then and Labour will pay for it at the polls.

The more you ignore the truth and Labour&#039;s actions speak louder than words, the more Labour will deserve the whacking the election will deliver... Brown can&#039;t dither and hide forever...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liz &#8211; The general point I make and the one you seem unwilling to answer, is that the nasty party is now Labour and not the Tories and you brought this up not me!</p>
<p>The Tories were over a decade ago &#8211; old story.</p>
<p>Labour do not help the weak and needy &#8211; 10p tax removal &#8211; nasty.<br />
Labour try to take compensation from our injured soldiers &#8211; nasty.<br />
Labour remove the funding to properly equip our soldiers &#8211; nasty.<br />
Labour arrest 86 year old Walter Wolfgang under the Terrorism Act &#8211; nasty.</p>
<p>I could go on and list dozens of similar &#8220;nasty&#8221; actions by this party even without mentioning the gap between the rich and poor increasing or telling lies about overseas wars.</p>
<p>I have no particular obsession with that useless bully Gordon Brown or the way he treats people in his own party (Peter Watt, Tony Blair, David Miliband etc) I just think that if more people like me were listened to and less unacceptable behaviour was accepted we could put a case to the British people for re-election.</p>
<p>By ignoring (so far you haven&#8217;t even given your opinion on any of my points eg Camerons son Ivan, 10p tax, Gurkha&#8217;s)the way Brown and his cohorts behave, what you are doing Liz is telling the party leadership that it is OK to continue like that.</p>
<p>Well it isn&#8217;t OK Liz and should have been stopped by having a general election after Brown forced Blair out. His behaviour was underhand and despicable then and Labour will pay for it at the polls.</p>
<p>The more you ignore the truth and Labour&#8217;s actions speak louder than words, the more Labour will deserve the whacking the election will deliver&#8230; Brown can&#8217;t dither and hide forever&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz McShane</title>
		<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2010/02/campaign-launched-to-commit-britain-to-spending-0-point-7-per-cent-of-national-income-on-development-aid/comment-page-1/#comment-5382</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz McShane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=7508#comment-5382</guid>
		<description>Anon - where do I start....?

Re The Met - you make them sound as if they have been on a major rampage. It was tragic that their actions re the G20 summit resulted in a death but I do think he police are much more accountable these days and that there is more transparency but that does not condone or excuse the loss of a  life.

I admit that not all Tories are nasty - the patrician-style ones such as Ken Clarke etc are decent, humane people, but there is still a very strong Thatcherite vein running through their blood and all this cuddly- &#039;let&#039;s hug a hoodie&#039; stuff is a complete veneer and I think what really informs and drives the party. Take a look at what Toby Young wrote about him in his blog yesterday:
/blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/tobyyoung/100024959/100024959/

I agree that Labour/New Labour is /was not perfect but they did more to help the many rather than the few and that STILL is the raison d&#039;etre and why I would say the vast majority of people join the party and actively campaign for it on a regular basis.


There is still room to debate policies such as ID cards - it&#039;s still not a given (and  by the way, something that I am not a fan of for various reasons - cost as well as civil liberty aspect).

I still think and am worried by your(potentially dangerous) obsession with Gordon - I really don&#039;t think it&#039;s healthy for you!

In the last few days, polls together with the fact that Chris Grayling doesn&#039;t understand statistics, has shown that the election is still there to be won and the more that people such as Osborne, Grayling et al are tested they fall at the first hurdle.

I think if you asked people who benefitted from the minimum wage etc and people who didn&#039;t lose their homes or jobs in the last 12-18 months, they would be very positive towards GB and his masterful handling of the economy in what has been  a very turbulent and uncertain period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon &#8211; where do I start&#8230;.?</p>
<p>Re The Met &#8211; you make them sound as if they have been on a major rampage. It was tragic that their actions re the G20 summit resulted in a death but I do think he police are much more accountable these days and that there is more transparency but that does not condone or excuse the loss of a  life.</p>
<p>I admit that not all Tories are nasty &#8211; the patrician-style ones such as Ken Clarke etc are decent, humane people, but there is still a very strong Thatcherite vein running through their blood and all this cuddly- &#8216;let&#8217;s hug a hoodie&#8217; stuff is a complete veneer and I think what really informs and drives the party. Take a look at what Toby Young wrote about him in his blog yesterday:<br />
/blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/tobyyoung/100024959/100024959/</p>
<p>I agree that Labour/New Labour is /was not perfect but they did more to help the many rather than the few and that STILL is the raison d&#8217;etre and why I would say the vast majority of people join the party and actively campaign for it on a regular basis.</p>
<p>There is still room to debate policies such as ID cards &#8211; it&#8217;s still not a given (and  by the way, something that I am not a fan of for various reasons &#8211; cost as well as civil liberty aspect).</p>
<p>I still think and am worried by your(potentially dangerous) obsession with Gordon &#8211; I really don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s healthy for you!</p>
<p>In the last few days, polls together with the fact that Chris Grayling doesn&#8217;t understand statistics, has shown that the election is still there to be won and the more that people such as Osborne, Grayling et al are tested they fall at the first hurdle.</p>
<p>I think if you asked people who benefitted from the minimum wage etc and people who didn&#8217;t lose their homes or jobs in the last 12-18 months, they would be very positive towards GB and his masterful handling of the economy in what has been  a very turbulent and uncertain period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

