<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tory stats questioned again as Hammond makes &#8220;unfair comparison&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftfootforward.org/2010/02/tory-stats-questioned-again-as-hammond-makes-unfair-comparison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2010/02/tory-stats-questioned-again-as-hammond-makes-unfair-comparison/</link>
	<description>Left Foot Forward is a political blog for progressives. We provide evidence-based analysis on British politics, news and policy developments.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tory document still claims deprived under-18s 3x more likely to become pregnant &#124; Left Foot Forward</title>
		<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2010/02/tory-stats-questioned-again-as-hammond-makes-unfair-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-5862</link>
		<dc:creator>Tory document still claims deprived under-18s 3x more likely to become pregnant &#124; Left Foot Forward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=7690#comment-5862</guid>
		<description>[...] not apologised &#8211; and shadow chief secretary Philip Hammond was accused of making an &#8220;unfair comparison&#8221; on debt levels.    Share  &#124; Permalink  &#124; Leave a comment                   Click here to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not apologised &#8211; and shadow chief secretary Philip Hammond was accused of making an &#8220;unfair comparison&#8221; on debt levels.    Share  | Permalink  | Leave a comment                   Click here to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coventry Labour</title>
		<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2010/02/tory-stats-questioned-again-as-hammond-makes-unfair-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-8023</link>
		<dc:creator>Coventry Labour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 10:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=7690#comment-8023</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @leftfootfwd: Tory use of statistics questioned again as Philip Hammond makes &quot;unfair comparisons&quot; http://bit.ly/aY6Vht (h/t @alexhilton)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @leftfootfwd: Tory use of statistics questioned again as Philip Hammond makes &quot;unfair comparisons&quot; <a href="http://bit.ly/aY6Vht" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/aY6Vht</a> (h/t @alexhilton)</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2010/02/tory-stats-questioned-again-as-hammond-makes-unfair-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-5426</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=7690#comment-5426</guid>
		<description>Will, as we discussed on Twitter, I take what you say at face value, but it does seem likely that Pat Boyden&#039;s press release was at the root of the article that prompted this post.

I think Evan&#039;s made the case for comparison pretty well, and, if there&#039;s any credibility in the idea the numbers aren&#039;t comparable, I&#039;m sure we&#039;ll see some of the MSM taking this angle in due course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will, as we discussed on Twitter, I take what you say at face value, but it does seem likely that Pat Boyden&#8217;s press release was at the root of the article that prompted this post.</p>
<p>I think Evan&#8217;s made the case for comparison pretty well, and, if there&#8217;s any credibility in the idea the numbers aren&#8217;t comparable, I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;ll see some of the MSM taking this angle in due course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Price</title>
		<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2010/02/tory-stats-questioned-again-as-hammond-makes-unfair-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-5425</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=7690#comment-5425</guid>
		<description>Have a look at this page - http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/otherinformation/statistics/201002/index.htm - it is the current data produced by the Insolvency Service.

If you scroll down through the data you will find Figure 5 - Individual Insolvencies in England &amp; Wales - and you will note that Bankruptcy Orders are the most numerous they have ever been since 1987.  

I don&#039;t believe that you will find any cautions about comparing the data in the release from the Insolvency Service, because they don&#039;t believe that the data (which is actual numbers, rather than estimates) is not comparable.

Yes, IVA&#039;s are easier than they were; yes the effect of a straightforward BO are less than they were; but to point to the bare facts that we are seeing more individual insolvencies than at any time since the introduction of the 86 Act is not &#039;deceptive&#039; or &#039;unfair&#039;.  The consequences of bankruptcy, even with the changes brought about by the 2000 and 2002 Acts, are severe - on the individuals and their families - and a personal tragedy in each and every case.

No-one I know would consider the reduction from 3 years to 1 for the time to be able to seek automatic discharge from bankruptcy as being an incentive to make yourself bankrupt.  Legal changes went both ways - assisting a cooperative bankrupt and assisting creditors and trustees to deal with uncooperative bankrupts.

BTW, Insolvency forms about 40% of my practice at the Bar and I don&#039;t believe that you would find many lawyers involved in Insolvency litigation who would say that the comparisons are &#039;unfair&#039; ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have a look at this page &#8211; <a href="http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/otherinformation/statistics/201002/index.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/otherinformation/statistics/201002/index.htm</a> &#8211; it is the current data produced by the Insolvency Service.</p>
<p>If you scroll down through the data you will find Figure 5 &#8211; Individual Insolvencies in England &amp; Wales &#8211; and you will note that Bankruptcy Orders are the most numerous they have ever been since 1987.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe that you will find any cautions about comparing the data in the release from the Insolvency Service, because they don&#8217;t believe that the data (which is actual numbers, rather than estimates) is not comparable.</p>
<p>Yes, IVA&#8217;s are easier than they were; yes the effect of a straightforward BO are less than they were; but to point to the bare facts that we are seeing more individual insolvencies than at any time since the introduction of the 86 Act is not &#8216;deceptive&#8217; or &#8216;unfair&#8217;.  The consequences of bankruptcy, even with the changes brought about by the 2000 and 2002 Acts, are severe &#8211; on the individuals and their families &#8211; and a personal tragedy in each and every case.</p>
<p>No-one I know would consider the reduction from 3 years to 1 for the time to be able to seek automatic discharge from bankruptcy as being an incentive to make yourself bankrupt.  Legal changes went both ways &#8211; assisting a cooperative bankrupt and assisting creditors and trustees to deal with uncooperative bankrupts.</p>
<p>BTW, Insolvency forms about 40% of my practice at the Bar and I don&#8217;t believe that you would find many lawyers involved in Insolvency litigation who would say that the comparisons are &#8216;unfair&#8217; &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emma Burnell</title>
		<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2010/02/tory-stats-questioned-again-as-hammond-makes-unfair-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-8024</link>
		<dc:creator>Emma Burnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=7690#comment-8024</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @BevaniteEllie: Dear Tories, advice-steer clear of comparisons you can&#039;t defend. Regards, Ellie http://tinyurl.com/yfvrgon (via @leftfootfwd )&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @BevaniteEllie: Dear Tories, advice-steer clear of comparisons you can&#39;t defend. Regards, Ellie <a href="http://tinyurl.com/yfvrgon" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/yfvrgon</a> (via @leftfootfwd )</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Straw</title>
		<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2010/02/tory-stats-questioned-again-as-hammond-makes-unfair-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-5421</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Straw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=7690#comment-5421</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Matthew. I hadn&#039;t see the press release and spoke to Pat Boyden this afternoon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Matthew. I hadn&#8217;t see the press release and spoke to Pat Boyden this afternoon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2010/02/tory-stats-questioned-again-as-hammond-makes-unfair-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-8025</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=7690#comment-8025</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;A quick comment from me http://bit.ly/bl6o9c on this @LeftFootFwd piece http://bit.ly/bAsnue Pays to think about people&#039;s motives&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">A quick comment from me <a href="http://bit.ly/bl6o9c" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/bl6o9c</a> on this @LeftFootFwd piece <a href="http://bit.ly/bAsnue" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/bAsnue</a> Pays to think about people&#39;s motives</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2010/02/tory-stats-questioned-again-as-hammond-makes-unfair-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-5418</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=7690#comment-5418</guid>
		<description>Gee, did PriceWaterhouse Coopers issue a press release this morning, in the hopes of getting their brand out there on the back of these figures?

Wouldn&#039;t it have been more honest to link to the press release: http://bit.ly/dCL1aU

It includes some wonderful titbits you didn&#039;t bother with, like:

&quot;Total household borrowing currently stands at £1.5 trillion. Unsecured borrowing remained broadly constant over the past 12 months at around £230 billion (in stark contrast to the 6% growth seen in 2008). Average household debt stands at £60,000 per house made up of £50,000 in secured debt and £10,000 in unsecured debt. The average household will need to spend approximately 15% of net income just to service interest payments arising from this debt&quot;

and 

&quot;Figures released today by the Government’s Insolvency Service revealed that levels of personal insolvency in the UK have increased for the eighth consecutive quarter and are at the highest level since records began.&quot;

&#039;course focusing on those bits of the release might attract questions about how we reached that situation.

Lets not even mention the fact that PWC are a bit accountancy firm which earns lots of money from...yes, you guessed it - insolvencies!

Wonder if big accountancy firms might be keen to avoid criticism of the high level of insolvencies? Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, did PriceWaterhouse Coopers issue a press release this morning, in the hopes of getting their brand out there on the back of these figures?</p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it have been more honest to link to the press release: <a href="http://bit.ly/dCL1aU" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/dCL1aU</a></p>
<p>It includes some wonderful titbits you didn&#8217;t bother with, like:</p>
<p>&#8220;Total household borrowing currently stands at £1.5 trillion. Unsecured borrowing remained broadly constant over the past 12 months at around £230 billion (in stark contrast to the 6% growth seen in 2008). Average household debt stands at £60,000 per house made up of £50,000 in secured debt and £10,000 in unsecured debt. The average household will need to spend approximately 15% of net income just to service interest payments arising from this debt&#8221;</p>
<p>and </p>
<p>&#8220;Figures released today by the Government’s Insolvency Service revealed that levels of personal insolvency in the UK have increased for the eighth consecutive quarter and are at the highest level since records began.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8216;course focusing on those bits of the release might attract questions about how we reached that situation.</p>
<p>Lets not even mention the fact that PWC are a bit accountancy firm which earns lots of money from&#8230;yes, you guessed it &#8211; insolvencies!</p>
<p>Wonder if big accountancy firms might be keen to avoid criticism of the high level of insolvencies? Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2010/02/tory-stats-questioned-again-as-hammond-makes-unfair-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-5414</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=7690#comment-5414</guid>
		<description>All politicians twist numbers to suit their arguments. Take debt, we&#039;ve seen policy distorted for the sole reason of hiding the debt off the public books, PFI has proved more expensive, more awkward but it&#039;s been used simply because it allowed debt to be parked off the Treasury&#039;s balance sheet. Even stats were misused by former Home Secretary Jacqui Smith.

It&#039;s important to be alert to these things and thankfully the blogosphere is often quick to expose the moves of sly politicians like Philip Hammond or Gordon Brown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All politicians twist numbers to suit their arguments. Take debt, we&#8217;ve seen policy distorted for the sole reason of hiding the debt off the public books, PFI has proved more expensive, more awkward but it&#8217;s been used simply because it allowed debt to be parked off the Treasury&#8217;s balance sheet. Even stats were misused by former Home Secretary Jacqui Smith.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s important to be alert to these things and thankfully the blogosphere is often quick to expose the moves of sly politicians like Philip Hammond or Gordon Brown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Cooper</title>
		<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2010/02/tory-stats-questioned-again-as-hammond-makes-unfair-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-8026</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 17:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=7690#comment-8026</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @BevaniteEllie: Dear Tories, advice-steer clear of comparisons you can&#039;t defend. Regards, Ellie http://tinyurl.com/yfvrgon (via @leftfootfwd )&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @BevaniteEllie: Dear Tories, advice-steer clear of comparisons you can&#39;t defend. Regards, Ellie <a href="http://tinyurl.com/yfvrgon" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/yfvrgon</a> (via @leftfootfwd )</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

