World on course for 3.5-degree rise
A majority of the world’s nations yesterday signed up to the Copenhagen Accord and filed plans for emissions reductions, scraping over the UN deadline of January 31st for doing so. The pledged actions, however, fall far short of action needed to prevent global temperatures rising by 2 degrees C – the target adopted in the text of the Accord itself.
Instead, existing actions set the world on course for a 3.5 degrees Celsius temperature rise, according to earlier analysis of pledges carried out by consultancy firm Ecofys.
PriceWaterhouseCoopers calculate that on current projections the world will burn up its allocated carbon budget for the first half of the century by 2034 – 16 years ahead of schedule.
There had been concerns in the weeks running up to the deadline that countries would not even submit pledges – a concern heightened when Yvo de Boer, Chairman of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), played down its significance, saying:
“It’s a soft deadline, there’s nothing deadly about it.”
Chinese and Indian officials had been briefing that their two nations might not sign up to the Accord, despite playing key roles in its creation. New Zealand wobbled about its commitment, only signing up at the very last moment.
Whilst most countries restated the emissions pledges they had made in the run-up to the Copenhagen talks, Canada took the opportunity to decrease its targets. In a staggering sleight of hand, Canada’s Environment Minister, Jim Prentice, said that he wished to “continentalise” his country’s emissions-reduction plan by harmonising actions with those of the United States.
This means that Canada’s 2020 target drops from a 20 per cent cut on 2006 levels to a 17 per cent cut on 2005 levels. Using the 1990 baseline adopted by most countries, this actually allows for a 2.5 per cent increase in Canada’s emissions.
Most of the numbers submitted were expressed as ranges, subject to being ratcheted up or down depending on other countries’ commitments. Developing countries are not obliged to make absolute emissions reductions under the Accord, but instead are encouraged to set out plans for slowing emissions growth.
Of these, China’s are the most ambitious, offering a 40 to 45 per cent cut in carbon intensity per unit of GDP by 2020.
The most ambitious commitments came, ironically, from the world’s smallest and most vulnerable countries. The Maldives, which is set to be one of the first island-states to be submerged by rising sea levels, pledged to become carbon neutral by 2020 – a 100 per cent cut in net carbon emissions.
Latin American state Costa Rica pledged to match this target by 2021. The low-lying Marshall Islands also pledged a 40 per cent cut by 2020.
A handful of countries have rejected the Copenhagen Accord and refused outright to sign up – including Cuba, Venezuela, Bolivia, and Sudan – nations which had also blocked the UN from adopting the Accord as a formal plan during the closing sessions of the Copenhagen talks.
A UN summary of signatory nations will be published soon.
-
http://twitter.com/elrikmerlin/status/8501511194 Elrik Merlin
-
http://twitter.com/hannahnicklin/status/8501559294 hannahnicklin
-
http://twitter.com/poblishlab/status/8501662170 Andrew Regan
-
http://twitter.com/guyshrubsole/status/8502008221 Guy Shrubsole
-
http://twitter.com/guyshrubsole/status/8502139133 Guy Shrubsole
-
http://twitter.com/david_ritter/status/8502480545 David Ritter
-
http://www.ubervu.com/conversations/www.leftfootforward.org/2010/02/world-on-course-for-3point5-degree-rise/ uberVU – social comments
-
Anon E Mouse
-
http://twitter.com/hackofalltrades/status/8511925054 Liam Barrington-Bush
-
http://www.howtogetyourexbacknow.org/ how to get him back
YouGov Tracker
ToUChstone Economic Tracker
George’s Marvellous Deficit Calculator
Most read this week
- Climate change sceptics and rural romantics – the Tories are a shambles on renewable energy
- As order breaks down in Syria, its Christians suffer the consequences
- Don’t believe the spin – the health reforms are Cameron’s just as much as Lansley’s
- Amidst the burning flesh of Homs, Syrians plead: “We are getting slaughtered, save us”
- The shocking effect of Gove’s EMA axe: Youngsters skipping food to get to college
Best of the web
Top issues
Left Foot Facebook
Awards & Rankings
Archive
Tag Cloud
Domestic Progressives
- A Thousand Cuts
- Alastair Campbell
- Andrew Gibson's Blog
- Anthony Painter
- Ayes To The Left
- Blackburn Labour Party
- Chartist
- Conor's Commentary
- Dave's Part
- Diary of a Benefit Scrounger
- Duncan's Economic Blog
- Follow my leaders
- Freemania
- Full Fact
- Go Fourth
- Good Animal / Bad Animal
- Guardian Politics blog
- Harry's Place
- Hopi Sen
- Institute for Government
- Intelligence Squared
- Labour and Capital
- Labour Home
- Labour List
- LabourHome
- Left Central
- Lib-Con Trick
- Liberal Conspiracy
- Liberal Democrat Voice
- LSE politics blog
- Luke's blog
- Mark Thompson Blog
- Matthew Taylor's blog
- Max Atkinson's blog
- Migrants' Rights Network
- New Statesman: free speech
- Next Left
- Nick Pearce
- OurKingdom
- Patrick Bury's blog
- Policy Critical
- Political Reboot
- Political Scrapbook
- Progress
- Red Brick
- RSA Projects
- Runnymede Trust
- Rupa Huq's Blog
- Sadie's Tavern
- Save EMA
- Shamik Das
- Slinger blog
- Tank the Tories
- Tax Research UK
- The Centre Left
- The Green Benches
- The Novocastrian
- This is my truth
- Tim McLoughlin
- Tom Harris MP
- Tom Watson MP
- Touchstone
- Touchstone TUC blog
- Young Fabians Blog







