Published by , March 5th 2010 at 12:12 pm
Digital Economy Bill: From bad to worse
Left Foot Forward has previously highlighted many of the flaws within the Digital Economy Bill currently going through parliament. The latest proposed amendments by Liberal Democrat and Conservative peers seeks to bring into the bill an internet infrastructure similar to that currently enjoyed in authoritarian countries around the world establishing a national blocklist of sites.
Inclusion on the blocklist would be based around accusations of copyright infringement with no apparent process of redress to remove a site from the blocklist.
Lord Clement-Jones talked about his party’s position on the Digital Economy Bill on LibDem Voice.
Clement-Jones tries to excuse this tactic, more associated with North Korea than Clapham North, by pointing to the list of recommended blocked sites currently held by the Internet Watch Foundation. However, vague accusations of copyright infringement are not the same as the serious child sexual abuse content that Internet Watch Foundation deals with.
Many of the sites discussed are used by consumers and businesses for perfectly legitimate reasons. And in common with the technological solutions used by authoritarian regimes can be circumvented through the use of free proxy servers or low-cost foreign virtual private network services.
A telling comment on Clement-Jones’ post points to his association with DLA Piper, a law firm which specialises in intellectual property cases and has:
“Acted for, and lobbied on behalf of, the RIAA and MPAA in the past.”
Perhaps the most telling mark of the proceedings is credited to Lord Puttnam by The Guardian:
“On Monday, Lord Puttnam said that the scheme was being rushed through parliament without sufficient scrutiny, and that legislators were subject to an ‘extraordinary degree of lobbying’ from copyright holders.“
Blog Poll 2010
Best of the web
Awards & Rankings
Archive
Domestic Progressives
- A Thousand Cuts
- Alastair Campbell
- Anthony Painter
- Blackburn Labour Party
- Conor's Commentary
- Dave's Part
- Duncan's Economic Blog
- Freemania
- Go Fourth
- Guardian Politics blog
- Harry's Place
- Hopi Sen
- Labour and Capital
- LabourHome
- LabourList
- Lib-Con Trick
- Liberal Conspiracy
- Liberal Democrat Voice
- LSE politics blog
- Luke's blog
- Mark Reckons
- Matthew Taylor's blog
- Next Left
- New Statesman: free speech
- The Novocastrian
- OurKingdom
- Policy Critical
- Political Scrapbook
- Progress
- RSA Projects
- Runnymede Trust
- Shamik Das
- Slinger blog
- Tank the Tories
- Tax Research UK
- This is my truth
- Tim McLoughlin
- Tom Harris MP
- Tom Watson MP
- Touchstone TUC blog
- Young Fabians Blog
Global Progressives
Climate Progressives
RT @leftfootfwd: Digital Economy Bill: From bad to worse: http://is.gd/9KbCn says @r_c of @ruderfinn
Left Foot Forward: Digital Economy Bill: From bad to worse. http://tinyurl.com/ybx2nbd
RT @leftfootfwd: Digital Economy Bill: From bad to worse: http://is.gd/9KbCn says @r_c of @ruderfinn
RT @leftfootfwd: Digital Economy Bill: From bad to worse: http://is.gd/9KbCn says @r_c of @ruderfinn
Digital Economy Bill: From bad to worse: http://is.gd/9KbCn says @r_c of @ruderfinn
Typical Lib Dems. They are supposed to be about freedom and civil liberties, but their love of the market and of money always tips them into the camp of the industry lobbyists.
RT @robinboast Left Foot Forward: Digital Economy Bill: From bad to worse. http://tinyurl.com/ybx2nbd
[...] Digital Economy Bill: From bad to worse | Left Foot Forward [...]
[...] Digital Economy Bill: From bad to worse [...]
I hope you are going to update your coverage fairly to include the debate at LibDem Spring conference which reaffirmed the party’s commitment to open access to the internet and the further amendments tabled by LibDem peers as a result. This confirms that the Liberal Democrats are living up to their name and offering a positive challenge to the authoritarian policies of Labour.