The High Court today ruled that the government’s position on airport expansion is “untenable in law and common sense” - prompting a re-think of their analysis.
They won’t like it, but they’ll have to go along with it. With the High Court today ruling that the government’s position on airport expansion is “untenable in law and common sense”, ministers’ plans for a third runway at Heathrow lie in tatters.
John McDonnell, the Labour MP for Hayes and Harlington, who has led a 30-year campaign against the extension of the west London airport, said:
“In essence this judgment means that the game is up for a third runway at Heathrow and I am calling upon the Government to accept the inevitable and lift this threat to my community.”
If ministers decide to still try and pursue their plans for Heathrow expansion, they will be forced to go back to square one and reconsider their entire national aviation policy, as the Judge ruled they must now factor in the impacts of flying on the climate and re-do their economic analysis.
Crucially, the Judge ruled with regard to the government’s 2003 aviation white paper – the basis for airport expansion plans around the UK including at Heathrow – that:
“Common sense demanded that a policy established in 2003, before the important developments in climate change policy, symbolised by the Climate Change Act 2008, should be subject to review in the light of those developments.”
The judge also said that “it makes no sense to treat the economic case as settled in 2003” and expressed real concern at what he called the “hardship caused to the local community by uncertainty” over the third runway.
This ruling can be seen as the climax of a huge civil society campaign that has seen an unprecedented joint effort by green groups, local councils, west London community groups and the grassroots climate movement.
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
7 Responses to “High Court: UK aviation policy “untenable””
Mr. Sensible
In spite of my leftwerd leanings I think this is a good move and I hope the government will now kick this in to touch.
However, lets not go pretending that the Tories are all somehow environmental heros; their own MPs and candidates are not even convinced about climate change!
Of the 2 opposition parties, the one who’s transport policy makes any sense really is that of the Liberal Democrats.
WingMuse
High Court: UK aviation policy "untenable" | Left Foot Forward: The High Court today ruled that the government's p… http://bit.ly/9r1733
Fred Taylor
High Court: UK aviation policy "untenable" | Left Foot Forward http://bit.ly/cuT7VL
LadyRoisin
RT @leftfootfwd: High Court: UK aviation policy "untenable": http://bit.ly/awCAtt
Rom REEVES
High Court: UK aviation policy "untenable" | Left Foot Forward http://bit.ly/cfDWYw