<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Searching for consensus on how to tackle inequality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftfootforward.org/2010/03/searching-for-consensus-on-how-to-tackle-inequality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2010/03/searching-for-consensus-on-how-to-tackle-inequality/</link>
	<description>Left Foot Forward is a political blog for progressives. We provide evidence-based analysis on British politics, news and policy developments.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Worstall</title>
		<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2010/03/searching-for-consensus-on-how-to-tackle-inequality/comment-page-1/#comment-10309</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Worstall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=9627#comment-10309</guid>
		<description>&quot;John Hills pointed out some of the starker facts, that a tenth of social housing tenants on their retirement have assets (including everything they own) worth less than £3,000, compared with the £900,000 a professional is likely to end up with, for example.&quot;

That is entirely bollocks. Man should be ashamed of himself for saying it.

Firstly, the report which said that quite deliberately includes private pension assets but not state pension. The state pension is an annuity just like a private sector one is and should thus be counted. The state pension is thus an asset worth some £60k or so (depending upon how you measure life spans and future inflation). And no, you can&#039;t sell your private pension plan either.

Secondly, social housing tenants have a housing asset: their right to occupy subsidised social housing. This is again best treated as an annuity for valuation purposes.

What is so intensely annoying about the current debates about &quot;wealth inequality&quot; is that everyone is ignoring the things we do to reduce it. Everyone in this country has a valuable financial asset. It&#039;s called the welfare state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;John Hills pointed out some of the starker facts, that a tenth of social housing tenants on their retirement have assets (including everything they own) worth less than £3,000, compared with the £900,000 a professional is likely to end up with, for example.&#8221;</p>
<p>That is entirely bollocks. Man should be ashamed of himself for saying it.</p>
<p>Firstly, the report which said that quite deliberately includes private pension assets but not state pension. The state pension is an annuity just like a private sector one is and should thus be counted. The state pension is thus an asset worth some £60k or so (depending upon how you measure life spans and future inflation). And no, you can&#8217;t sell your private pension plan either.</p>
<p>Secondly, social housing tenants have a housing asset: their right to occupy subsidised social housing. This is again best treated as an annuity for valuation purposes.</p>
<p>What is so intensely annoying about the current debates about &#8220;wealth inequality&#8221; is that everyone is ignoring the things we do to reduce it. Everyone in this country has a valuable financial asset. It&#8217;s called the welfare state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sahil</title>
		<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2010/03/searching-for-consensus-on-how-to-tackle-inequality/comment-page-1/#comment-10225</link>
		<dc:creator>sahil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=9627#comment-10225</guid>
		<description>While plenty has been said about the spiralling income inequality, there has been nothing about the inequality of political power.

Asking a government to promote the interests of the majority is pointless when that majority has little power. It’s a chicken-egg conundrum. With the break-up of unions, political power over the economy has been lost, and with the collapse of party membership numbers, power over the party system has been lost.

Until we discover ways of giving the majority of people political and economic leverage, the left will struggle to find electoral success. The obvious question is how exactly do we do that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While plenty has been said about the spiralling income inequality, there has been nothing about the inequality of political power.</p>
<p>Asking a government to promote the interests of the majority is pointless when that majority has little power. It’s a chicken-egg conundrum. With the break-up of unions, political power over the economy has been lost, and with the collapse of party membership numbers, power over the party system has been lost.</p>
<p>Until we discover ways of giving the majority of people political and economic leverage, the left will struggle to find electoral success. The obvious question is how exactly do we do that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Left Foot Forward</title>
		<link>http://www.leftfootforward.org/2010/03/searching-for-consensus-on-how-to-tackle-inequality/comment-page-1/#comment-34481</link>
		<dc:creator>Left Foot Forward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=9627#comment-34481</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Searching for consensus on how to tackle inequality: http://cli.gs/3aEXY&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Searching for consensus on how to tackle inequality: <a href="http://cli.gs/3aEXY" rel="nofollow">http://cli.gs/3aEXY</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

