Policies must be subjected to a “fairness test”
Our guest writers are Professors Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett, authors of The Spirit Level: Why Equality is Better for Everyone and co-founders of The Equality Trust
All the main political parties are talking about ‘fairness’. They all say inequalities are too big and need to be reduced. That is a lot better than not talking about it, but the talk is almost never related to any specific policy commitment to make Britain a fairer society. Today a coalition of academics and charities, including the Equality Trust, is asking party leaders to address this.
The evidence shows that life in societies with smaller income differences between rich and poor is better for almost everyone. Levels of child wellbeing are higher in more equal societies; community life is stronger and people trust each other more.
Even middle class people are likely to live longer, happier lives and are less likely to become victims of violence if they live in more equal societies. Their children are less likely to get involved in drugs, to suffer mental illness, or to become teenage parents. All these benefits of greater equality are within our grasp and it would be a crime to let them slip away from us.
In a recent report, the National Equality Panel said that the next government’s policies to reduce the deficit will be the most important influence on what happens to inequality. The least well off should not have to shoulder the burden of a recession created by the rich.
Nor should the bonus culture be allowed to continue unchecked while unemployment rises. Choices will have to be made between cutting Trident, ID cards or social security benefits, between making income taxes more progressive or increasing VAT.
For the good of our whole society, it is high time policies were assessed for their impact on inequality. That is why a large coalition of charities, including the Equality Trust, has come together and written to the three main party leaders to ask them to commit to a Fairness Test.
This would ensure that major tax or spending changes are rigorously assessed for their impact on inequality. Carried out by the Treasury, an Inequality Impact Assessment would ensure that governments cannot make major changes without being aware of the consequences for inequality and the knock-on effects on the cohesiveness and wellbeing of the whole society.
Such assessments are needed to inform a robust debate on decisions that will have to be taken during the next parliament. The deficit could be reduced in ways which would improve the wellbeing of the whole society, or in ways which would inflict further damage.
Rather than fudging these crucial issues, we need to see our party leaders committing themselves to instituting this Fairness Test and reducing inequality from the start of the next parliament.
-
http://twitter.com/equalitytrust/status/12878185052 The Equality Trust
-
http://twitter.com/sspcampsie/status/12878168100 SSP Campsie
-
Mister Jabberwock
-
http://twitter.com/guyaitchison/status/12885368277 GuyAitchison
-
Will
-
http://www.touchstoneblog.org.uk/2010/04/the-fairness-test-for-cuts/ The Fairness Test for Cuts | ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC
-
http://bestblogs.labourhome.org/2010/04/26/policies-must-be-subjected-to-a-%e2%80%9cfairness-test%e2%80%9d/ Policies must be subjected to a “fairness test” « The best Labour blogs
-
http://twitter.com/disabilitywales/status/19833455106 Disability Wales
-
http://twitter.com/hiablog/status/19834671782 Ben Harris-Roxas HIA
-
http://twitter.com/hiablog/status/19835356607 Ben Harris-Roxas HIA
-
http://twitter.com/croakeyblog/status/19867132178 Melissa Sweet
YouGov Tracker
ToUChstone Economic Tracker
George’s Marvellous Deficit Calculator
Most read this week
- The DWP’s ‘scrounger’ rhetoric is causing real harm
- The government’s drug policy favours dogma over harm reduction
- Climate change sceptics and rural romantics – the Tories are a shambles on renewable energy
- Polls apart? The news for the SNP might not be as good as it looks
- Amidst the burning flesh of Homs, Syrians plead: “We are getting slaughtered, save us”
Best of the web
Top issues
Left Foot Facebook
Awards & Rankings
Archive
Tag Cloud
Domestic Progressives
- A Thousand Cuts
- Alastair Campbell
- Andrew Gibson's Blog
- Anthony Painter
- Ayes To The Left
- Blackburn Labour Party
- Chartist
- Conor's Commentary
- Dave's Part
- Diary of a Benefit Scrounger
- Duncan's Economic Blog
- Follow my leaders
- Freemania
- Full Fact
- Go Fourth
- Good Animal / Bad Animal
- Guardian Politics blog
- Harry's Place
- Hopi Sen
- Institute for Government
- Intelligence Squared
- Labour and Capital
- Labour Home
- Labour List
- LabourHome
- Left Central
- Lib-Con Trick
- Liberal Conspiracy
- Liberal Democrat Voice
- LSE politics blog
- Luke's blog
- Mark Thompson Blog
- Matthew Taylor's blog
- Max Atkinson's blog
- Migrants' Rights Network
- New Statesman: free speech
- Next Left
- Nick Pearce
- OurKingdom
- Patrick Bury's blog
- Policy Critical
- Political Reboot
- Political Scrapbook
- Progress
- Red Brick
- RSA Projects
- Runnymede Trust
- Rupa Huq's Blog
- Sadie's Tavern
- Save EMA
- Shamik Das
- Slinger blog
- Tank the Tories
- Tax Research UK
- The Centre Left
- The Green Benches
- The Novocastrian
- This is my truth
- Tim McLoughlin
- Tom Harris MP
- Tom Watson MP
- Touchstone
- Touchstone TUC blog
- Young Fabians Blog







