On Legal Aid, the government’s sums don’t add up
Andy Slaughter MP is the shadow justice minister
The Tory-led government is planning a major reduction in the scope and availability of Legal Aid. One aspect of their planned cuts is to end provision of legal aid for welfare benefit problems, removing funding for the whole legal process, from initial advice services to court counsel.
These cases usually involve appealing against unfair decision making by the Department for Work and Pensions, local councils and other bodies. If these cases cannot be settled outside court, they are heard at First Tier Tribunals. In their Green Paper, the Government defends these cuts by arguing that representing yourself (pdf, see 4.217-4.219) in First Tier Tribunals is simple.
As a former legal practitioner myself, I find this extremely worrying, and over the last few months I have submitted a series of written Parliamentary questions to find the quantitative basis for the government’s claims.
The information I received in answer to these questions reveals a huge difference between success rates at the First Tier Tribunals for those with and without representation. We have calculated that – had the proposed cuts been in place – 51,223 cases that were successful last year would not have been, due to the lack of representation.
Behind these statistics, each failed appeal represents an individual or family that is likely to be in a position of severe financial stress. Some will be at risk of losing their homes, others will be left housebound and helpless; all will be at risk of accumulating further health, financial, family and civil legal problems.
However, the argument in defence of legal aid is not limited to one of compassion. There is also a powerful economic case.
The net cost to the public purse of this constriction of the justice system will be far more than the cost of providing Legal Aid in the first place. Citizens Advice has calculated the yield (pdf) for every pound spent on Legal Aid and affiliated advisory services. Legal aid expenditure on benefits advice saves the state more money than any other area of civil advice; for every pound spent, the state potentially saves £8.80.
It is nonsensical, both in terms of maintaining equal access to justice and in basic economics, to cut these long established public services.
This is the truth about cuts to welfare Legal Aid. People who rely on legal services would win meritorious cases if they were given the right legal advice. If these proposals are promulgated, people that struggle with the complex process of preparing grounds for appeal, whether because of language issues, special educational needs, mental health problems, or simply because our civil law system is fraught with complicated traditions and terminology, will lose their cases.
The planned cuts will end the average person’s ability to hold the state to account in cases of poor decision-making and will end up costing the state more than it currently spends providing Legal Aid to our country’s most vulnerable.
-
http://twitter.com/brokenofbritain/status/32473380938588160 Broken OfBritain
-
http://twitter.com/jamesweston1991/status/32473600774639616 James Weston
-
http://twitter.com/imranahmed1978/status/32473655313170432 Imran Ahmed
-
http://twitter.com/hammersmithandy/status/32476897145257984 Andy Slaughter
-
http://twitter.com/sadiqkhan/status/32487087118753793 Sadiq Khan
-
http://twitter.com/lucyrigby/status/32487212557803520 Lucy Rigby
-
http://twitter.com/sara_e_ibrahim/status/32487250247815168 Sara Ibrahim
-
http://twitter.com/bristolred/status/32487397509828608 Darren Lewis
-
http://twitter.com/chrisplol/status/32489296535494656 Chris Paul
-
http://twitter.com/mister_buttons/status/32489729467355136 mister buttons
-
http://twitter.com/stereotypestan/status/32490548820443136 Marcus Chavken
-
http://twitter.com/whitefieldlab/status/32495330071150593 Whitefield Labour
-
http://twitter.com/ldtuc/status/32499021431963648 L DTUC
-
http://twitter.com/pro_law/status/32499573838577664 PRO Law
-
http://twitter.com/nickbloke/status/32500755592122368 Nick H.
-
http://twitter.com/prolawrssfeed/status/32501851475677184 MyProLaw
-
http://twitter.com/justiceall/status/32503790884093952 JusticeForAll
-
http://twitter.com/pro_legal/status/32505470467973120 PRO Legal
-
http://twitter.com/wiltshirecab/status/32522599426686976 WiltsCitizensAdvice
-
http://twitter.com/miriamsaid/status/32522619710349312 Miriam Said
-
http://twitter.com/stecroz61/status/32529738417307648 steve crozier
-
http://twitter.com/womensapparel20/status/32531158008860672 Angela Grandstaff
-
http://twitter.com/southhamscab/status/32538172294438912 southhamscab
-
http://twitter.com/dearskippy/status/32543964443709440 dear
-
http://twitter.com/cjalliance/status/32548671002255360 CJA
-
Mr. Sensible
-
http://twitter.com/prolawrssfeed/status/32586348296667136 MyProLaw
-
http://twitter.com/roundclapton/status/32586473052045313 roundclapton
-
http://twitter.com/subaruoflondon/status/32600543356526592 subaruoflondon
-
http://twitter.com/luvmyyorkiecm/status/32600689381220352 luvmyyorkiecm
-
Qadeer
-
http://twitter.com/thercutsnotours/status/32610185537126400 Ian Rathbone
-
http://twitter.com/torypresshq/status/32755515037589504 Tory Press HQ
-
Pete
-
Dan Filson
-
http://twitter.com/weavervalecf/status/32796472932048896 Weaver Vale cf
-
Rob
-
Yvonne Hossack
-
http://twitter.com/catherinecox2/status/32883891844947968 catherinecox2
YouGov Tracker
ToUChstone Economic Tracker
George’s Marvellous Deficit Calculator
Most read this week
- Week Outside Westminster: Is Cameron a separatist sleeper-cell?
- "You've never had it so good" has never been so wrong: Review of The Cost of Inequality
- Tory voters trust BMA and co. over Cameron and Lansley on the NHS
- German superunion to begin negotiating for 6.5 per cent wage increase
- Building social housing would cut the housing benefit bill three times faster than a cap
Best of the web
Top issues
Left Foot Facebook
Awards & Rankings
Archive
Tag Cloud
Domestic Progressives
- A Thousand Cuts
- Alastair Campbell
- Andrew Gibson's Blog
- Anthony Painter
- Ayes To The Left
- Blackburn Labour Party
- Chartist
- Conor's Commentary
- Dave's Part
- Diary of a Benefit Scrounger
- Duncan's Economic Blog
- Follow my leaders
- Freemania
- Full Fact
- Go Fourth
- Good Animal / Bad Animal
- Guardian Politics blog
- Harry's Place
- Hopi Sen
- Institute for Government
- Intelligence Squared
- Labour and Capital
- Labour Home
- Labour List
- LabourHome
- Left Central
- Lib-Con Trick
- Liberal Conspiracy
- Liberal Democrat Voice
- LSE politics blog
- Luke's blog
- Mark Thompson Blog
- Matthew Taylor's blog
- Max Atkinson's blog
- Migrants' Rights Network
- New Statesman: free speech
- Next Left
- Nick Pearce
- OurKingdom
- Patrick Bury's blog
- Policy Critical
- Political Reboot
- Political Scrapbook
- Progress
- Red Brick
- RSA Projects
- Runnymede Trust
- Rupa Huq's Blog
- Sadie's Tavern
- Save EMA
- Shamik Das
- Slinger blog
- Tank the Tories
- Tax Research UK
- The Centre Left
- The Green Benches
- The Novocastrian
- This is my truth
- Tim McLoughlin
- Tom Harris MP
- Tom Watson MP
- Touchstone
- Touchstone TUC blog
- Young Fabians Blog







