Countering the myths that bankers will leave if bonuses are reduced
Duncan Exley is the campaign director for One Society
When George Osborne today announced an increase in the bank levy, he also conceded he had not yet struck a deal on limiting bankers’ bonuses, nine months after the coalition agreement promised:
“…robust action to tackle unacceptable bonuses in the financial services.”
There is widespread anger because bonuses are out of proportion with average incomes, reasonable reward, or the perceived social usefulness of banks.
Despite this, and the person-hours spent exploring options, we still do not have even a weak response to astronomical bonuses. This suggests we need to institutionalise some checks and balances, to avoid an annual ritual of calling for a steam hammer to crack a nutty level of pay and bonuses.
One precondition for this would be for the government, opposition and commentators to counter the “big-bonuses-are-necessary” myths with evidence. One common myth is that bankers would leave if bonuses were reduced. However, recent research by eFinancial Careers confirmed that:
“The fact the payments are higher in London pours cold water on the claim that bankers would leave Britain for jobs overseas if they were not paid big bonuses.”
i.e bonuses can take quite a cut before bankers are tempted to move elsewhere. Where bonuses have been restricted, some in banking admitted that this caused:
“…no problems recruiting a bumper crop of talent.”
The other big myth, that bonuses improve performance, is contradicted by academic psychological research commissioned by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston:
“…for tasks that include a cognitive component, there seems to be a level of incentive beyond which further increases can have detrimental effects on performance.”
This suggests that raising low pay may be beneficial.
Beside myth-busting, the composition of the groups who scrutinise and decide high pay and bonuses should be broadened. This could include:
• Mandating the inclusion of investor and employee representatives in remuneration committees, and instituting equivalent structures to scrutinise and set bonus strategy;
• Requiring the highest bonuses to be revealed in annual reports, alongside the ratio between an organisation’s top and bottom remuneration rates; and
• Requiring investors to report how they have voted at AGMs, as advocated by Fair Pensions and others. In the case of banks, major shareholders include our pension funds and our government: shouldn’t we be told how they are using the votes they cast on our behalf?
The current BIS review, ‘A Long-Term Focus for Corporate Britain’, to which One Society has responded, has begun to ask whether broadening the group of those who scrutinise and decide remuneration rates would be helpful, though some lobby groups have warned against such moves, fearing results that appear similar to the mythical spectres discussed above.
-
http://twitter.com/matt_zarbcousin/status/35013281877856256 Matthew Zarb-Cousin
-
http://twitter.com/ronisgreat/status/35014743932542978 ronisgreat
-
http://twitter.com/one_society/status/35015987615117312 One Society campaign
-
Liz McShane
-
http://twitter.com/fairpensions/status/35019389883392000 FairPensions
-
http://twitter.com/igav/status/35020174520356864 Gavin Duff
-
http://twitter.com/one_society/status/35020473439879168 One Society campaign
-
http://twitter.com/downinjamaica/status/35022218194845696 downinjamaica
-
Richard
-
http://twitter.com/brutus_teabags/status/35026642262818816 Brutus Teabags
-
http://twitter.com/janewatkinson/status/35033538650841088 Jane Watkinson
-
http://twitter.com/andrewtindall/status/35033613984604161 Andrew Tindall
-
http://twitter.com/gertiepink/status/35034752440479744 Rachel
-
http://twitter.com/gertiepink/status/35035430864961536 Rachel
-
http://twitter.com/robinhood/status/35040321863680000 Robin Hood
-
http://twitter.com/bilbobaggins2k/status/35041932304453632 Kathrine Stokes
-
http://twitter.com/mdoness/status/35042510720077824 glynis powell
-
http://twitter.com/olliestoney/status/35043116088180736 Oliver Stoney
-
http://twitter.com/itsmotherswork/status/35049667158872065 Itsmotherswork
-
http://twitter.com/gailcartmail/status/35049668677206016 Gail Cartmail
-
http://twitter.com/andyfenlon/status/35049692526018561 Andrew Fenlon
-
http://twitter.com/northerntuc/status/35050145947062272 Northern TUC
-
http://twitter.com/jodatu/status/35058165292863488 John Turner
-
http://twitter.com/unisoneastmids/status/35061057114341376 UNISON East Midlands
-
http://twitter.com/hannah_2809/status/35061231400263680 Hannah Lownsbrough
-
http://twitter.com/geecologist/status/35062028338991104 Tom Allen
-
http://twitter.com/444blackcat/status/35064220135600128 johntucker
-
http://twitter.com/tompowdrill/status/35064480928894976 tompowdrill
-
http://twitter.com/ldtuc/status/35069016338993152 L DTUC
-
http://twitter.com/simpkins83/status/35070992594247680 simpkins83
-
http://twitter.com/double_karma/status/35076183213359104 Double.Karma
-
http://twitter.com/nickcdx/status/35078671408570368 Nick Beddow
-
http://twitter.com/colinjacksn/status/35088411865907200 Colin Jackson
-
http://twitter.com/rctunison/status/35108099119386624 RCT UNISON
-
http://twitter.com/myinfamy/status/35108527051644928 Daniel Pitt
-
Mr. Sensible
-
http://www.leftfootforward.org/2011/02/tory-links-to-city-exposed/ Tory dependence on City money should come as no surprise | Left Foot Forward
-
http://twitter.com/britainologist/status/36678633825247232 britainologist
-
http://janespoliticalramblings.wordpress.com/2011/02/28/uk-uncut-and-unmasking-the-banks-informal-power-structures/ UK Uncut and unmasking the banks’ informal power structures…. « My Political Ramblings
-
http://www.leftfootforward.org/2011/12/bankers-bonuses-are-contributing-to-the-new-credit-crunch/ How bankers’ bonuses are contributing to the new credit crunch | Left Foot Forward
YouGov Tracker
ToUChstone Economic Tracker
George’s Marvellous Deficit Calculator
Most read this week
- Week Outside Westminster: Is Cameron a separatist sleeper-cell?
- "You've never had it so good" has never been so wrong: Review of The Cost of Inequality
- Tory voters trust BMA and co. over Cameron and Lansley on the NHS
- German superunion to begin negotiating for 6.5 per cent wage increase
- Building social housing would cut the housing benefit bill three times faster than a cap
Best of the web
Top issues
Left Foot Facebook
Awards & Rankings
Archive
Tag Cloud
Domestic Progressives
- A Thousand Cuts
- Alastair Campbell
- Andrew Gibson's Blog
- Anthony Painter
- Ayes To The Left
- Blackburn Labour Party
- Chartist
- Conor's Commentary
- Dave's Part
- Diary of a Benefit Scrounger
- Duncan's Economic Blog
- Follow my leaders
- Freemania
- Full Fact
- Go Fourth
- Good Animal / Bad Animal
- Guardian Politics blog
- Harry's Place
- Hopi Sen
- Institute for Government
- Intelligence Squared
- Labour and Capital
- Labour Home
- Labour List
- LabourHome
- Left Central
- Lib-Con Trick
- Liberal Conspiracy
- Liberal Democrat Voice
- LSE politics blog
- Luke's blog
- Mark Thompson Blog
- Matthew Taylor's blog
- Max Atkinson's blog
- Migrants' Rights Network
- New Statesman: free speech
- Next Left
- Nick Pearce
- OurKingdom
- Patrick Bury's blog
- Policy Critical
- Political Reboot
- Political Scrapbook
- Progress
- Red Brick
- RSA Projects
- Runnymede Trust
- Rupa Huq's Blog
- Sadie's Tavern
- Save EMA
- Shamik Das
- Slinger blog
- Tank the Tories
- Tax Research UK
- The Centre Left
- The Green Benches
- The Novocastrian
- This is my truth
- Tim McLoughlin
- Tom Harris MP
- Tom Watson MP
- Touchstone
- Touchstone TUC blog
- Young Fabians Blog







