Baroness Williams hits out at NHS reforms
Senior Lib Dem peer Shirley Williams has said she can’t support the government’s NHS reforms, calling the scale of the reforms “too great” and leaving “too many questions unanswered”. Writing in this morning’s Times (£), she questions the cost of the reorganisation, the accountability of the new GP consortiums, the role of the private sector and patient choice.
Baroness Williams says (£):
What is the cost? The Government must reduce public spending from 2011- 2015 by £80 billion. If it can’t, its strategy will have failed. The NHS accounts for a third of England’s revenue budget and 11 per cent of its capital budget. It faces relentlessly growing demand.
David Nicholson, the chief executive of the NHS and now of the National Commissioning Board, noted in 2009 that the NHS must find £15-£20 billion in efficiency savings in the next four years. But he himself believes that “to do so will require clear and effective management every step of the way”.
Key to this is a 40 per cent cut in management costs. Already hundreds of managers have left Primary Care Trusts at a cost of about £1 billion. The impact of this is not yet known, but GP commissioning consortiums are bound to look for good managers, some of whom will be hired from outside the NHS.
They are likely to cost more. Some 20 per cent of the savings will come from moving patients from specialised hospital care to treatment by GPs or nurses in the community.
The final 40 per cent will have to come from clinicians and hospitals, an estimated £2 billion a year. Such huge savings will almost certainly entail an element of rationing. Waiting lists for routine operations are lengthening, and in some cases they are being postponed or cancelled. As the National Audit Office observed: “Government reorganisations … frequently entail higher costs than anticipated”.
Accountability: What arrangements are there to hold GP consortiums accountable for quality of care? Primary care trusts (PCTs) were accountable to Strategic Health Authorities and, ultimately, to the Secretary of State. They were overseen by local authority committees. Meetings were held in public and the minutes made available.
The new consortiums, responsible for about £80 billion, are not obliged to meet in public. Local health-watch groups may scrutinise them but have no power to hold them accountable.
Suggestions for adding knowledgeable lay people, members of other medical professions such as clinicians or nurses and elected local representatives have come from many quarters, but it will be up to each consortium to decide for itself.
Accountability upwards will be to the Secretary of State via the NHS Commissioning Board, but the board has no powers of oversight.
The private sector: What are the Government’s intentions here? Private medical practices work closely with NHS colleagues and were encouraged by Labour to bid for contracts at a price determined by the NHS tariff. Competition for these contracts depended on the quality and effectiveness of service. There is a cap on the proportion of private beds in Foundation Trust hospitals, which varies according to earnings from private patients and is much higher in London. Last year the private sector treated 220,000 patients.
The Government is now preparing to remove the cap, renegotiate the tariff and require the National Commissioning Board to promote competition. This will open the door to competition on price, not just quality.
Many clinicians fear that the private sector will skim off profitable routine operations, leaving expensive, complicated treatment to the NHS.
The body that will license health providers is Monitor, which oversees foundation trusts. Its chairman, David Bennett, wants healthcare exposed to competition like gas and rail. British Gas raised energy prices by 7 per cent last year, while making £700 million in profits. Since rail privatisation, the UK had paid the highest fares in Europe. Should this inspire confidence?
Patient choice: How does the Secretary of State reconcile this with the need for large savings? Mr Lansley puts great emphasis on the involvement of patients in their own treatment. That’s good but achieving it in practice is hard. Articulate and self-confident people are likely to benefit, but elderly or busy patients will have little basis for their choices beyond rumour or GPs’ advice. Choice must be balanced against the realities of a publicly funded service.
Underlying the debate about health is another about values. For some of us, health care is a public service, strengthened by partnership and co-operation, the model in most Western European countries. For others, it is a market in which price determines quality, the US pattern.
A June 2010 study of 11 health systems by the US-based Commonwealth Fund said of the US system:
“Compared with … Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands and the UK, the US system ranks last or next to last on five dimensions … quality, access, efficiency, equity and healthy lives.”
The NHS was the second least expensive per person after New Zealand, and came first on effective care, efficiency and cost-related access, and second on equity and in the overall ranking. Why we should dismember this remarkably successful public service for an untried and disruptive reorganisation amazes me. I remain unconvinced.
Her comments echo concerns she expressed in the run-up to the Liberal Democrat party conference in September, when she said:
“I’m profoundly worried about the white paper on health, we have a health system which is notably improved, the outcomes have come right up to the best European standards.”
And earlier this month, a number of health organisations expressed serious misgivings about the coalition’s NHS reforms, including the King’s Fund, NHS Alliance, NHS Confederation, Royal College of General Practitioners and The Nuffield Trust.
-
http://twitter.com/johnedginton/status/42169952102260736 John Edginton
-
http://twitter.com/mudlarklives/status/42171159474749440 Clay Harris
-
http://twitter.com/paul_r_kenny/status/42172205982810112 Paul Kenny
-
http://twitter.com/iannellin/status/42175324364083200 Nicola Iannelli
-
http://twitter.com/smithattheedge/status/42175747158310913 Chris Smith
-
http://twitter.com/alexioskomnenus/status/42176247861739520 Will James Slater
-
http://twitter.com/smithattheedge/status/42177042552340480 Chris Smith
-
http://twitter.com/westernshores/status/42178829019516928 Pen
-
http://twitter.com/economy7/status/42181037773553664 economy7.co.uk
-
http://twitter.com/falseecon/status/42186610892214272 False Economy
-
http://twitter.com/bendygirl/status/42186797731553280 BendyGirl
-
http://twitter.com/nyebeverage/status/42187554329460736 nyebeverage
-
http://twitter.com/curlyminx/status/42187653180956672 Debs
-
http://twitter.com/frdragonspouse/status/42188215104454656 Jill Hayward
-
http://twitter.com/visceralwriting/status/42188310822522880 Pauline Kiernan
-
http://twitter.com/ladywolfcub/status/42192728590794752 wolflady
-
http://twitter.com/hellsbells265/status/42201201382670336 Helen Thomas
-
http://torylies.blogspot.com Richard Blogger
-
http://twitter.com/hospitaldr/status/42201419767492608 Mike Broad
-
http://twitter.com/oldmankelv/status/42203310706532352 Kelvin John Edge
-
http://twitter.com/personagratia/status/42209192374706176 Susan Ackroyd
-
http://twitter.com/oldmankelv/status/42210481242517504 Kelvin John Edge
-
http://twitter.com/oldmankelv/status/42210535441317888 Kelvin John Edge
-
http://twitter.com/nickbloke/status/42211106457911296 Nick H.
-
http://twitter.com/nickbloke/status/42211129824378880 Nick H.
-
http://twitter.com/unitonehifi/status/42215282311307264 chris star
-
http://twitter.com/savethenhs/status/42215548217462784 Save The NHS
-
http://twitter.com/unisontweets/status/42215612021215232 UNISON – the union
-
http://twitter.com/unisonmv/status/42215678266056704 UNISON MillionVoices
-
http://twitter.com/walthamfrank/status/42215777650081792 Frank roper
-
http://twitter.com/joe380/status/42220535236661248 Joseph O’Brien
-
http://twitter.com/ashke50/status/42220816699621376 Abi O
-
http://twitter.com/moorlandmiss/status/42223449489276928 Eleanor Checkley
-
http://twitter.com/eurodocstar/status/42225985168490496 Essy
-
http://twitter.com/lewsosnhs/status/42227696742305792 lewsosnhs
-
Anon E Mouse
-
http://twitter.com/ldtuc/status/42279893257551872 L DTUC
-
rhys
-
Mrs Diana Rae
-
http://twitter.com/staffsunison/status/42382118122295296 Staffordshire UNISON
-
Mr. Sensible
-
http://twitter.com/pigreen/status/42570368971579392 pigreen
-
http://twitter.com/fairywishes/status/42575688099831808 Elly Hase
-
http://twitter.com/jesseboucher/status/42667351564488704 Jesse Boucher
-
http://www.leftfutures.org/2011/03/where-are-the-social-democrats-now/ Where are the Social Democrats now? | Left Futures
-
http://www.leftfootforward.org/2011/03/andrew-lansley-price-competition-healthcare/ Lansley’s retreat on price completion for healthcare deceit | Left Foot Forward
-
Keith James
-
http://www.leftfootforward.org/2011/04/is-andrew-lansley-really-listening/ Is Lansley really listening? | Left Foot Forward
-
EVA HOLMES
-
http://www.leftfootforward.org/2011/09/baroness-shirley-williams-coalition-nhs-reforms-criticism/ Baroness Williams: Coalition “bewitched by a flawed US system” | Left Foot Forward
YouGov Tracker
ToUChstone Economic Tracker
George’s Marvellous Deficit Calculator
Most read this week
- Week Outside Westminster: Is Cameron a separatist sleeper-cell?
- "You've never had it so good" has never been so wrong: Review of The Cost of Inequality
- Tory voters trust BMA and co. over Cameron and Lansley on the NHS
- German superunion to begin negotiating for 6.5 per cent wage increase
- Building social housing would cut the housing benefit bill three times faster than a cap
Best of the web
Top issues
Left Foot Facebook
Awards & Rankings
Archive
Tag Cloud
Domestic Progressives
- A Thousand Cuts
- Alastair Campbell
- Andrew Gibson's Blog
- Anthony Painter
- Ayes To The Left
- Blackburn Labour Party
- Chartist
- Conor's Commentary
- Dave's Part
- Diary of a Benefit Scrounger
- Duncan's Economic Blog
- Follow my leaders
- Freemania
- Full Fact
- Go Fourth
- Good Animal / Bad Animal
- Guardian Politics blog
- Harry's Place
- Hopi Sen
- Institute for Government
- Intelligence Squared
- Labour and Capital
- Labour Home
- Labour List
- LabourHome
- Left Central
- Lib-Con Trick
- Liberal Conspiracy
- Liberal Democrat Voice
- LSE politics blog
- Luke's blog
- Mark Thompson Blog
- Matthew Taylor's blog
- Max Atkinson's blog
- Migrants' Rights Network
- New Statesman: free speech
- Next Left
- Nick Pearce
- OurKingdom
- Patrick Bury's blog
- Policy Critical
- Political Reboot
- Political Scrapbook
- Progress
- Red Brick
- RSA Projects
- Runnymede Trust
- Rupa Huq's Blog
- Sadie's Tavern
- Save EMA
- Shamik Das
- Slinger blog
- Tank the Tories
- Tax Research UK
- The Centre Left
- The Green Benches
- The Novocastrian
- This is my truth
- Tim McLoughlin
- Tom Harris MP
- Tom Watson MP
- Touchstone
- Touchstone TUC blog
- Young Fabians Blog







