Today’s Express, Mail, Sun and Telegraph all wrong on Incapacity Benefit
Over the last few months, Left Foot Forward, along with Full Fact and Touchstone, has been critical of misleading press stories about the benefit system and those who depend on it based on figures released by the Department for Work and Pensions – in some cases released confidentially to selected journalists.
A reprimand from the Statistics Commissioner has led to some improvement in transparency in DWP’s handling of evidence, but the problem of misleading reporting hasn’t gone away. While inaccurate stories may in some cases be attributed to failures on the part of journalists, the fact is that if government doesn’t want the figures it is releasing to be distorted, it can take steps to ensure this doesn’t happen.

As anybody who has been involved in briefing the press on issues of public concern knows, heading off easily-anticipated misinterpretations of the evidence is a key part of the task. Misleading stories such as this one in today’s Telegraph (and Mail, Sun and Express) are eminently avoidable.
The Telegraph headline read:
‘Two in three benefit claimants are fit for work’
With the report stating:
“That means roughly 70 per cent of those claiming money on the grounds that they were too sick to work were in fact capable of holding down some form of paid employment.”
The evidence for this assertion comes from the first results from the pilots extending Employment Support Allowance to existing claims for Incapacity Benefit and incapacity-related Income Support.
In fact, as the DWP’s press release shows, the reassessment found that 71 per cent of claimants were not ‘fit for work’. How did the Telegraph, Mail, Sun and Express get it so wrong – and get it wrong in exactly the same way?
The main changes which ESA has brought in compared to the previous system are:
(a) A tighter assessment of eligibility, known as the Work Capability Assessment (WCA); and
(b) The introduction of a new distinction between claimants who are deemed to be able to undertake some ‘work related activity’ and those who are not. IB didn’t make this distinction, meaning that people with very different levels of impairment were treated similarly.
Under ESA, those who are found to be ‘fit to work’ on the new WCA are not eligible for ESA, but can apply for Jobseeker’s Allowance – in other words, they are treated as being unemployed rather than as having ‘limited capability for work’. Those who are found to have ‘limited capability for work’ are entitled to ESA and are assigned either to the ‘work-related activity’ group or, if they are not deemed able to undertake work-related activity, to the ‘support group’.
Today’s press stories conflate those who are found ‘fit to work’ with those who are not found fit to work but are found capable of some ‘work related activity’.
This shows a complete misunderstanding of the main intention of introducing ESA in the first place, which was to provide more support and greater conditionality for those who were not ‘fit to work’ but could be expected to be able to return to work at some point in the future, while maintaining unconditional support for those who were not in this position.
That 29% were found ‘fit to work’ looks like a strong enough finding, so what led journalists to exaggerate this to ‘two in three’? Perhaps the steady stream of misleading stories about Incapacity Benefit over recent months has raised the bar to the point where 29% just doesn’t look like a big enough figure.
The figure is not in itself surprising: the WCA was introduced with the explicit intention of tightening eligibility compared to IB and it is widely believed that the incentives for the providers who conduct the assessment are designed to bias judgment towards rejecting claims (a view supported by the high rate of successful appeals against WCA decisions).
What is more surprising in today’s figures is the high percentage of those who are not ‘fit for work’ who are also not able to undertake any ‘work-related activity’. When ESA was first proposed, it was widely assumed that the great majority of claimants who were not immediately ready to return to work would be able to start a ‘journey back to work’ with appropriate support. But for 526 claimants assigned to the work-related activity group, 422 were assigned to the support group.
This finding tends to support the argument raised here recently: the severity of impairment among claimants of incapacity benefit is far higher than is generally recognised. The fact that more than half of IB/ESA recipients, and two thirds of long-term recipients are also in receipt of Disability Living Allowance suggests that some of the expectations which both the current and previous governments have encouraged about the impact of changes to the benefit system are exaggerated.
Addressing the employment penalties faced by disabled people – at all levels of severity of impairment – is a much bigger task than the rhetoric of welfare reform often implies.
Most of today’s press coverage is emblematic of the distortions to which virtually any evidence on the welfare system is subject in the current climate: these stories seem be designed to foster suspicion and grievance with regard to benefit claimants.
When four national newspapers converge on the same misinterpretation of the evidence, some responsibility surely lies with those providing the figures.
Government could easily reduce the risk of this kind of misleading reporting by making sure that journalists understand the evidence and that its own briefing is clear and unambiguous – and when public resources are used for government media handling, why should we expect anything less?
• Read more about this story on Full Fact.
-
http://twitter.com/bendygirl/status/36093743631179778 BendyGirl
-
http://twitter.com/romilagupta/status/36094880136564736 Romila Chaplin
-
http://twitter.com/sinnaluvva/status/36095462457098240 Malcolm Evison
-
http://twitter.com/chr1sr0berts/status/36095913743089666 Chris Roberts
-
http://twitter.com/swannisgod/status/36097269455396864 Tom Wood
-
http://twitter.com/batsgirl/status/36097631465902080 Mary
-
http://twitter.com/graeme__smith/status/36097767117946880 Graeme Smith
-
http://twitter.com/brokenofbritain/status/36097838903468033 Broken OfBritain
-
http://twitter.com/ldtuc/status/36100269544574976 L DTUC
-
http://twitter.com/sean_gittins/status/36100718737756160 sean gittins
-
http://twitter.com/quarridors/status/36106214865633281 Quarries & Corridors
-
http://twitter.com/press_not_sorry/status/36112740401549312 Press Not Sorry
-
http://twitter.com/nickbloke/status/36113771009155072 Nick H.
-
http://twitter.com/extraditiongame/status/36117099214536704 Extradition Game
-
http://twitter.com/brokenofbritain/status/36118238525915136 Broken OfBritain
-
http://twitter.com/j_g_shute/status/36118608367190016 JEFF SHUTE
-
http://diaryofabenefitscrounger.blogspot.com Sue Marsh
-
http://twitter.com/banana_the_poet/status/36146480616050688 Michele Brenton
-
Declan
-
http://twitter.com/lisybabe/status/36149027875586048 Lisa E
-
http://twitter.com/barbmilne/status/36150769296220160 barb milne
-
http://twitter.com/sph1984/status/36164581965434880 Simon Hughes
-
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/ma.rathfelder/ Martin Rathfelder
-
Mr. Sensible
-
http://twitter.com/postpolionews/status/36240500042240002 Chris Salter
-
http://twitter.com/4alldigitalpr/status/36267077639602176 Yssel & Son’s
-
http://bit.ly/eLwJ9p Tacitus
-
http://twitter.com/idlevic/status/36395306652274688 Victoria F
-
Lepus Felix
-
http://twitter.com/mentalhealth_uk/status/36519373636255744 Catherine
-
http://twitter.com/pottersby/status/36520169396379648 Pottersby
-
http://twitter.com/dizzyingcrest/status/36566125869277185 Dizzying Crest
-
http://twitter.com/paulsandars/status/36566211382738944 Paul Sandars
-
http://twitter.com/yorkierosie/status/36567282641539072 yorkierosie
-
http://twitter.com/mailwatch/status/36570604899409920 Daily Mail Watch
-
http://twitter.com/expresswatch/status/36570748051005440 Express Watch (UK)
-
http://twitter.com/the_sun_lies/status/36570994126622721 The Sun-Tabloid Lies
-
http://twitter.com/rchrisp/status/36571404778340353 Rachael Chrisp
-
http://Facebook June Helm
-
http://twitter.com/rolanddale/status/36590463284674561 Roland Dale
-
http://twitter.com/cityalan/status/36700177637052417 Alan Simpson
-
mike cobley
-
Steve Smith
-
http://twitter.com/thebodmass/status/36761985378942976 Rod Boyle
-
http://twitter.com/actionforme/status/37112358274867200 Action for M.E.
-
Linda
-
http://twitter.com/cysglyd/status/37270741028175872 cysglyd
-
http://twitter.com/me_cfs/status/37459390852235264 M.E. Chronic Fatigue
-
http://twitter.com/charlysez/status/37471347982598144 Charlotte Abraham
-
http://cssanewsclips.wordpress.com/2011/02/17/news-clips-thursday-17-february-2011/ News clips – Thursday 17 February 2011 | CSSA news & research
-
http://www.leftfootforward.org/2011/10/what-the-express-hides-abou-charity-lottery/ Express plugs dirty Des’s dodgy lottery | Left Foot Forward
YouGov Tracker
ToUChstone Economic Tracker
George’s Marvellous Deficit Calculator
Most read this week
- Week Outside Westminster: Is Cameron a separatist sleeper-cell?
- "You've never had it so good" has never been so wrong: Review of The Cost of Inequality
- Tory voters trust BMA and co. over Cameron and Lansley on the NHS
- German superunion to begin negotiating for 6.5 per cent wage increase
- Building social housing would cut the housing benefit bill three times faster than a cap
Best of the web
Top issues
Left Foot Facebook
Awards & Rankings
Archive
Tag Cloud
Domestic Progressives
- A Thousand Cuts
- Alastair Campbell
- Andrew Gibson's Blog
- Anthony Painter
- Ayes To The Left
- Blackburn Labour Party
- Chartist
- Conor's Commentary
- Dave's Part
- Diary of a Benefit Scrounger
- Duncan's Economic Blog
- Follow my leaders
- Freemania
- Full Fact
- Go Fourth
- Good Animal / Bad Animal
- Guardian Politics blog
- Harry's Place
- Hopi Sen
- Institute for Government
- Intelligence Squared
- Labour and Capital
- Labour Home
- Labour List
- LabourHome
- Left Central
- Lib-Con Trick
- Liberal Conspiracy
- Liberal Democrat Voice
- LSE politics blog
- Luke's blog
- Mark Thompson Blog
- Matthew Taylor's blog
- Max Atkinson's blog
- Migrants' Rights Network
- New Statesman: free speech
- Next Left
- Nick Pearce
- OurKingdom
- Patrick Bury's blog
- Policy Critical
- Political Reboot
- Political Scrapbook
- Progress
- Red Brick
- RSA Projects
- Runnymede Trust
- Rupa Huq's Blog
- Sadie's Tavern
- Save EMA
- Shamik Das
- Slinger blog
- Tank the Tories
- Tax Research UK
- The Centre Left
- The Green Benches
- The Novocastrian
- This is my truth
- Tim McLoughlin
- Tom Harris MP
- Tom Watson MP
- Touchstone
- Touchstone TUC blog
- Young Fabians Blog







