The economic madness of imposing £9k tuition fees
With more and more universities set to charge the maximum £9,000 a year tuition fees, the cost of the government’s policy becomes ever more apparent. Today’s Guardian reports that the fee increase could leave a £1 billion gap in university funding, while a survey by the Times (£) of 40 institutions shows the average tuition fee will be £8,700 – just £300 below the cap.
Figures seen by Left Foot Forward show that, based on an assumed fee loan of £8,700, the additional public spending compared to the Treasury’s £7,500 average fee estimate will be £1.05bn over the spending review period.
Universities minister David Willetts had threatened that if fees average more than £7,500 then they will try and further cut higher education funding, and had said universities will only be able to charge the maximum £9,000 fees in “exceptional circumstances“.
Last October, Left Foot Forward, along with Andrew Harding of the 2me2you blog, looked at how the Browne Review (pdf), which recommended the rise in tuition fees, will end up costing the taxpayer more, that the proposals that were not only unfair but won’t reduce the deficit in the short-term.
As the 2me2you blog said at the time, citing data from the Higher Education Policy Institute:
“This analysis makes a mockery of any argument that could be made that suggests that reform of Higher Education funding is necessary or required by a need to save money.
“It does not save money - it costs money, which could be spent more fairly on increasing the core teaching resource. This analysis suggests that Vince Cable has lied to parliament, to the press and to his own party.
“And this analysis casts doubt on the commitment of the coalition to their own stated aim of deficit reduction. This reform is clearly a purely ideological move, attempting to reform Higher Education along market-driven lines with no proven benefits and several clear issues, not least the additional costs to young people.
“And can we really afford it? Apparently so.”
Not only is the government’s tuition fees policy wrong and unnecessary, but it is being incompetently implemented.
-
http://twitter.com/johnedginton/status/52431350824845312 John Edginton
-
http://twitter.com/shamikdas/status/52431579070472192 Shamik Das
-
Will Straw
-
http://twitter.com/keeleucu/status/52431938916597761 Keele UCU
-
http://twitter.com/saggydaddy/status/52436383922528256 Saggydaddy
-
http://twitter.com/leonardpboe/status/52436571521155072 Leo Boe
-
http://twitter.com/nus_kelley/status/52440622648401920 Kelley Temple
-
http://twitter.com/mattlodder/status/52444628753973248 Dr. Matt Lodder
-
http://twitter.com/2me2you2me/status/52445401332191232 2me2you
-
http://twitter.com/altany/status/52446731232755712 Altany
-
http://twitter.com/charmedlassie/status/52447250147852288 Lucy Brown
-
http://twitter.com/dkernohan/status/52448076077600768 David Kernohan
-
http://twitter.com/cash4student/status/52450862194372608 Selene C
-
Nordelius
-
http://www.shamik.co.uk Shamik Das
-
http://twitter.com/ahmad_noor/status/52470354068783104 Ahmad Noor
-
http://twitter.com/leicswoodcraft/status/52471467312553984 LDWF
-
http://twitter.com/carolineathope/status/52493990351745024 Caroline Bennett
-
http://twitter.com/myinfamy/status/52530828735025152 Daniel Pitt
-
http://twitter.com/reedvin/status/52724975374831640 vincent reed
-
http://twitter.com/debbieholley1/status/53076454103203840 Debbie Holley
-
http://www.leftfootforward.org/2011/03/david-cameron-pmqs-tuition-fees-regulator/ Cameron is wrong to suggest fees regulator has power to set levels | Left Foot Forward
-
http://twitter.com/chemosensors/status/53394579105394688 Tony James
-
http://twitter.com/2me2you2me/status/53523744093769728 2me2you
-
http://www.leftfootforward.org/2011/04/tuition-fees-policy-latest-reaction/ Tuition fees policy “shambolic”, “backfiring”, “a connoisseur’s cock-up” | Left Foot Forward
YouGov Tracker
ToUChstone Economic Tracker
George’s Marvellous Deficit Calculator
Most read this week
- Week Outside Westminster: Is Cameron a separatist sleeper-cell?
- "You've never had it so good" has never been so wrong: Review of The Cost of Inequality
- Tory voters trust BMA and co. over Cameron and Lansley on the NHS
- German superunion to begin negotiating for 6.5 per cent wage increase
- Building social housing would cut the housing benefit bill three times faster than a cap
Best of the web
Top issues
Left Foot Facebook
Awards & Rankings
Archive
Tag Cloud
Domestic Progressives
- A Thousand Cuts
- Alastair Campbell
- Andrew Gibson's Blog
- Anthony Painter
- Ayes To The Left
- Blackburn Labour Party
- Chartist
- Conor's Commentary
- Dave's Part
- Diary of a Benefit Scrounger
- Duncan's Economic Blog
- Follow my leaders
- Freemania
- Full Fact
- Go Fourth
- Good Animal / Bad Animal
- Guardian Politics blog
- Harry's Place
- Hopi Sen
- Institute for Government
- Intelligence Squared
- Labour and Capital
- Labour Home
- Labour List
- LabourHome
- Left Central
- Lib-Con Trick
- Liberal Conspiracy
- Liberal Democrat Voice
- LSE politics blog
- Luke's blog
- Mark Thompson Blog
- Matthew Taylor's blog
- Max Atkinson's blog
- Migrants' Rights Network
- New Statesman: free speech
- Next Left
- Nick Pearce
- OurKingdom
- Patrick Bury's blog
- Policy Critical
- Political Reboot
- Political Scrapbook
- Progress
- Red Brick
- RSA Projects
- Runnymede Trust
- Rupa Huq's Blog
- Sadie's Tavern
- Save EMA
- Shamik Das
- Slinger blog
- Tank the Tories
- Tax Research UK
- The Centre Left
- The Green Benches
- The Novocastrian
- This is my truth
- Tim McLoughlin
- Tom Harris MP
- Tom Watson MP
- Touchstone
- Touchstone TUC blog
- Young Fabians Blog







