How Pickles’s brutal council tax benefit reforms will pulverise the working-age poor
By Ed Turner, Lecturer in Politics at Aston University’s Centre for Europe, and Deputy Leader of Oxford City Council. The views expressed are his own.
The casual reader of the Department for Communities and Local Government website might think that the headline: ‘Supporting more people into work: councils to take the lead in boosting local economic prosperity’ was in some way good news. Sadly not: instead it marked the start of the long-overdue consultation on cutting 10% off the bill for council tax benefit, and allowing councils to devise their own
local benefit schemes.
Of all the areas of the government’s welfare reform agenda, this is probably the most ill-conceived and unpleasant, for reasons of both principle and practice.
Council tax benefit is cut paid to around 5.8 million people in Great Britain, at a cost of £4.8 billion (it’s a reserved matter and so the cut in funding will affect Scotland and Wales also, although these precise proposals will not).
It is administered by local councils alongside housing benefit, and gives a full or partial subsidy to the council tax that would be payable by those on low incomes. Currently, the government meets the full costs of council tax benefit; what we knew from the government’s spending review was that it intended to reduce the funding for council tax benefit by 10%, and allow local authorities to develop their own ways of paying it.
The government’s latest announcement includes one important new claim: that it intends to protect pensioners from any cuts by this policy. As a result, the 42% of claimants of council tax benefit who are aged over 65 may be unaffected, although the government has not announced the details of how they will be treated.
But of course this doesn’t affect the overall scale of the funding cut, so those below pension age will be hit nearly twice as heard. In broad terms, if the average council tax per dwelling in England is £1,195, then the average poorer claimant of working age, prior to yesterday’s announcement, would have expected to fork out £119.50 per annum out of his or her benefits; now that sum will be around £200 per annum.
This is wrong in both principle and in practice. Let’s start with the principle. First, the government has suggested that local authorities will be able to develop frameworks for council tax benefit costing less than their (reduced) government grant, and keep any difference.
So an authority will be financially rewarded for cutting benefits to the poor. In doing so, it might expect poorer people to move out of its area, further reducing council tax benefit bills, but adversely affecting neighbouring areas with more generous schemes, who will receive these desperate claimants – a classic ‘race to the bottom’.
Secondly, the government’s consultation patronisingly suggests the reform will “Give local authorities a greater stake in the economic future of their local area, and so supporting the Government’s wider agenda to enable stronger, balanced economic growth across the country”.
The idea that local councils are currently uninterested in levels of unemployment in their areas is pretty insulting, but more importantly, the government appears not to recognise that rises (and falls) in unemployment are, to a very significant degree, completely outside the control of local authorities. So, if a major employer in a town closes, not only will the local council have to deal with the social consequences, it will also find itself severely out of pocket because it will have to pay out more in council tax benefit.
Thirdly, the regional effects of this cut are highly unlikely to be equal: instead, as Dan Paskins of the New Policy Institute has shown, the cut in funds, if applied equally, will hit the poorest areas hardest: Haringey, Hartlepool and Liverpool, for instance, are in the top ten of losers per dwelling. In cutting funds for local government, it has been shown that the government has hit poorer areas the hardest, and this reform is set to exacerbate the trend.
The reform is also going to create mayhem in practice. For a start, the government has the aim of simplifying the benefits and tax credits system by introducing the “Universal Credit”; it is very hard to see how having 300 different local schemes of council tax benefit will help achieve this aim.
In addition, the hundreds of different council tax benefit schemes will be administered by local authorities. This currently happens alongside housing benefit, but under the universal credit, the administration of housing support will shift to the DWP; there have been assumptions this will reduce staffing costs – but if the staff are still needed to process council tax benefit, savings will be drastically reduced.
Moreover, the DWP, not local councils, will hold information (primarily on incomes and benefits) which will be needed to calculate the new council tax benefit entitlements, so the transfer of large amounts of data will be needed from the DWP’s highly risky, planned new IT system to local councils, just at the time when two systems of benefits will be running in tandem (universal credit for new claimants, administered by the DWP, and existing benefits including housing benefit for current claimants). It’s hard to see this herculean task being accomplished without chaos.
Finally, local authorities, already under severe financial pressure, are going to be exposed to tremendous risks, potentially facing catastrophic funding shortfalls for council tax benefit for several years if, for instance, unemployment rises.
The consultation document encourages them to earmark contingencies for increases in the number of claimants as well as, in the document’s words, dealing with the risk that “Local authorities struggle to collect increased amounts of council tax from those households who experience a reduction in support with their bill”. Pretty obviously, chasing people with little money for a proportion of their council tax will prove expensive, and will increase arrears.
One suspects that this particular cut was announced with little consideration for the consequences, which is why it has taken nearly a year to come up with this pathetic consultation document. Frankly, the government would do well to go back to the drawing board, rather than pressing on with a policy which is as economically inefficient as it is morally reprehensible.
-
http://twitter.com/rayzorcutz/status/99071813623091201 Rayzor
-
http://twitter.com/oneoflokis/status/99071988160667650 Liz K
-
http://twitter.com/bitfuzzy/status/99072312195809280 Deb
-
http://twitter.com/avichai15/status/99072724772728832 Paul McGlynn
-
http://twitter.com/isdancing/status/99072733157130241 Mabel Horrocks
-
http://twitter.com/davetaylor2112/status/99072793764839424 David Taylor
-
http://twitter.com/greenleftie/status/99073094081196032 Michael Bater
-
http://twitter.com/cuchulaindundee/status/99076499319173120 Alan Cowan
-
http://twitter.com/chrisbx515/status/99078564204384256 chris paling
-
http://twitter.com/simon_watkins/status/99079638348857346 Simon Watkins
-
http://twitter.com/lenarthur2/status/99084430873858048 Len Arthur
-
http://twitter.com/mylesr2011/status/99086726865240065 myles rhinds
-
http://twitter.com/therightarticle/status/99090722719936512 Michael
-
http://twitter.com/tjm_77/status/99091125859663872 Tim Martin
-
http://twitter.com/tracyandrab/status/99094967322034176 tracy ewan
-
http://twitter.com/cherryflip80/status/99096920563257345 Jodi Bailey
-
http://twitter.com/themingford/status/99116687038750720 Thomas Hemingford
-
http://munguinsrepublic.blogspot.com/ Tris
-
http://twitter.com/theuktoday/status/99118235294777344 Mike, England. UK
-
http://twitter.com/bristolnuj/status/99119998181703680 Bristol NUJ
-
http://twitter.com/evilc154/status/99120311185842176 Clive Burgess
-
Mrs. M
-
http://twitter.com/danielelton/status/99142121948323840 Daniel Elton
-
Leon Wolfson
-
http://twitter.com/pannusf10/status/99148740975263744 Suzanne Fitzgerald
-
http://twitter.com/adpucci/status/99150284932132865 Pucci Dellanno
-
Robert
-
http://twitter.com/45apl/status/99194651956887552 45apl
-
http://twitter.com/hens4freedom/status/99213554154094592 Hens4Freedom
-
http://twitter.com/somefah/status/99215646193225728 Sonia
-
http://twitter.com/caer23/status/99216364732035072 Caer
-
http://twitter.com/darkestangel31/status/99217043966001152 DarkestAngel
-
http://twitter.com/altgovuk/status/99246948715999232 AltGovUK
-
http://twitter.com/jblresearch/status/99247551181631488 John Lever
-
http://twitter.com/cityplymunison/status/99248932021993473 Plymouth City UNISON
-
http://twitter.com/virtualresistan/status/99249064843034625 VirtualResistance
-
http://twitter.com/philewis/status/99249236243259393 philip lewis
-
http://twitter.com/welfarerights4u/status/99249944065613825 Steven Preece
-
http://twitter.com/anubeon/status/99250522875363328 Lee Hyde
-
http://twitter.com/manishtas/status/99250585903177728 manishta sunnia
-
http://twitter.com/manishtas/status/99251105673904129 manishta sunnia
-
http://twitter.com/cllrkrichards/status/99255047057178624 Kevin Richards
-
kencap
-
http://twitter.com/dis_ppl_protest/status/99281180872015872 DPAC
-
http://twitter.com/thedancingflea/status/99368669607493632 Claire Spencer
-
http://twitter.com/mkhlabour/status/99368747256647680 M&KH Labour Party
-
http://twitter.com/jenny_drew/status/99370239254474752 Jenny Drew
-
http://twitter.com/respros/status/99370307508379648 Steve Chambers
-
http://twitter.com/mattclinch81/status/99371871719530496 Matt
-
http://twitter.com/forabw/status/99390355455229953 Bob Widdowson
-
Dave Citizen
-
http://twitter.com/june4th/status/99411892640034816 Noxi
-
Ed’s Talking Balls
-
Anon E Mouse
-
http://twitter.com/donpaskini/status/99491228462235648 Don Paskini
-
http://twitter.com/redmikerowley/status/99503972796219394 Mike Rowley
-
Dave Citizen
-
Anon E Mouse
-
http://twitter.com/akatwatford/status/99545980453666816 AsifK
-
Leon Wolfson
-
Dave Citizen
-
Anon E Mouse
-
Anon E Mouse
-
Clare Fernyhough
-
Leon Wolfson
-
Anon E Mouse
-
Leon Wolfson
-
Anon E Mouse
-
http://twitter.com/antoniabance/status/100656942707523586 Antonia Bance
-
http://twitter.com/helen_barnard/status/100923028585721856 Helen Barnard
-
http://leftfootfwd Rob Andersen
-
http://leftfootfwd Rob Andersen
-
http://www.leftfootforward.org/2011/10/council-tax-freeze-is-a-tax-cut-for-the-rich/ Council Tax freeze is a tax cut for the rich | Left Foot Forward
YouGov Tracker
ToUChstone Economic Tracker
George’s Marvellous Deficit Calculator
Most read this week
- Week Outside Westminster: Is Cameron a separatist sleeper-cell?
- "You've never had it so good" has never been so wrong: Review of The Cost of Inequality
- Tory voters trust BMA and co. over Cameron and Lansley on the NHS
- German superunion to begin negotiating for 6.5 per cent wage increase
- Building social housing would cut the housing benefit bill three times faster than a cap
Best of the web
Top issues
Left Foot Facebook
Awards & Rankings
Archive
Tag Cloud
Domestic Progressives
- A Thousand Cuts
- Alastair Campbell
- Andrew Gibson's Blog
- Anthony Painter
- Ayes To The Left
- Blackburn Labour Party
- Chartist
- Conor's Commentary
- Dave's Part
- Diary of a Benefit Scrounger
- Duncan's Economic Blog
- Follow my leaders
- Freemania
- Full Fact
- Go Fourth
- Good Animal / Bad Animal
- Guardian Politics blog
- Harry's Place
- Hopi Sen
- Institute for Government
- Intelligence Squared
- Labour and Capital
- Labour Home
- Labour List
- LabourHome
- Left Central
- Lib-Con Trick
- Liberal Conspiracy
- Liberal Democrat Voice
- LSE politics blog
- Luke's blog
- Mark Thompson Blog
- Matthew Taylor's blog
- Max Atkinson's blog
- Migrants' Rights Network
- New Statesman: free speech
- Next Left
- Nick Pearce
- OurKingdom
- Patrick Bury's blog
- Policy Critical
- Political Reboot
- Political Scrapbook
- Progress
- Red Brick
- RSA Projects
- Runnymede Trust
- Rupa Huq's Blog
- Sadie's Tavern
- Save EMA
- Shamik Das
- Slinger blog
- Tank the Tories
- Tax Research UK
- The Centre Left
- The Green Benches
- The Novocastrian
- This is my truth
- Tim McLoughlin
- Tom Harris MP
- Tom Watson MP
- Touchstone
- Touchstone TUC blog
- Young Fabians Blog







