Cameron’s benefit cap rewards family break-up
Writing in yesterday’s Mail on Sunday, prime minister David Cameron rooted the causes of the August riots in a deterioration in the nation’s values and argued this should be the government “that turns the tide on the anti-family feeling that has done such damage to this country’s values”; the benefit cap, however, will reward family break up, explains Sam Royston, poverty and early years policy adviser at The Children’s Society
In recent months, commentators, MPs, peers and even some ministers have raised concerns about a proposed benefits cap. When parliament convenes this week, it must address these concerns and make significant changes to support families.
The cap would limit benefits for out-of-work households to around £500 per week for couples and families with children or £350 per week for single people with no children. The coalition believes it would promote fairness, because it would prevent out-of-work households receiving more in benefits than the average household earns.
A closer look reveals that the cap is actually a painfully blunt tool, applied with little regard of people’s circumstances.
Not only would the cap disproportionately harm people who most need it, it runs counter to the coalition’s stated goals and needs to be reconsidered.
The Department for Work and Pensions’s equality impact assessment shows that 95 per cent of the households affected are likely to have children. Sixty per cent of those hit will be lone parent families and despite reassurances that households in receipt of Disability Living Allowance will be exempt from the cap, half of those affected are estimated to have someone with a disability in them.
In addition, there will be unintended consequences of the cap, which run contrary to key areas of government policy. In particular, in its coalition agreement, the government committed to reducing ‘couple penalties’ in the welfare system.
However, as I highlighted in a paper written for Family Action, this welfare cap would introduce one of the most substantial couple penalties ever seen in the benefits system. Couples have a higher benefit entitlement than single people. Job Seekers Allowance for a couple is £38.45 per week higher than for single people.
Therefore, compared to current entitlements, a couple with children and benefit entitlement in excess of the cap would lose up to £2,000 per year more than an equivalent single-parent household.
The benefits cap couple penalty is most apparent when two lone parent parents consider moving in together. Let’s say that Theresa and David are out-of-work, single parents who don’t know one another. They each have two children and pay £150 per week in rent. They receive benefit income of around £380 per week, which is below the £500 limit, so the cap would not affect them.
However, if Theresa and David met, fell in love and decided to move in together, they could pay a steep price for cohabitation if the cap is imposed.
Under the current welfare system, if the couple moved in together, as a four-child family, in a bigger, more expensive property costing £250 per week (still a £50 per week saving over renting separately), they would have a weekly benefit entitlement of around £640 per week.
Subsequently, the £500 benefit cap would chop the couple’s weekly income by £140 per week. As a result, they would lose nearly £7,300 a year, when compared to their current entitlement.
This would be likely to force Theresa, David and their children into the most severe poverty. It could easily keep them apart.
Having understood the central logic of the benefit cap, we can clearly see the reverse: That a similar married couple would be £7,300 a year better off separating and dividing their children, than staying together.
-
http://twitter.com/pmofguiseley/status/110661806099406848 PMofGuiseley
-
http://twitter.com/anonymoosh/status/110662082202058752 Ceehaitch
-
http://twitter.com/mylegalforum/status/110662425036062720 Nick
-
http://twitter.com/sam_royston/status/110662516308324352 Sam Royston
-
http://twitter.com/phdodd/status/110662634336030720 phil dodd
-
http://twitter.com/drdukeofurl/status/110662890037579776 larryb
-
http://twitter.com/bzz88/status/110662980148019201 HeyHo ~ Leonard Ho
-
http://twitter.com/c_a_jonestechno/status/110663699185942528 CAROLE JONES
-
http://twitter.com/davidhounsell/status/110663831746920448 David Hounsell
-
http://twitter.com/extraditiongame/status/110665868123455488 Extradition Game
-
http://twitter.com/mattwvincent/status/110669319037394944 Matt Vincent
-
http://twitter.com/juderobinson/status/110670758115688448 CllrJuderobinson
-
http://twitter.com/erazman/status/110671460988747776 E Azicate
-
http://twitter.com/frances_coppola/status/110672761675976704 Frances Coppola
-
http://twitter.com/labour52rose/status/110673001426587650 Alex Braithwaite
-
http://twitter.com/davidhounsell/status/110675968208805888 David Hounsell
-
http://twitter.com/therightarticle/status/110680540939681792 Michael
-
http://twitter.com/festinagirl/status/110680656622796801 festinagirl
-
http://twitter.com/lilminxv/status/110684106010009600 VeeBee
-
http://twitter.com/breakupexpert1/status/110686388122419200 darren samm
-
http://twitter.com/oilywaters/status/110686612551237633 H. O.
-
http://twitter.com/brokenofbritain/status/110690948677238784 Broken OfBritain
-
http://twitter.com/pumperninkel/status/110691519131959297 Queen P
-
http://twitter.com/aspiemum/status/110691761562730496 Vanessa
-
http://twitter.com/cv_london/status/110692678194298881 CV London
-
http://twitter.com/cutchswife/status/110693211906899968 cutchswife
-
http://twitter.com/littleredbadger/status/110696998713311232 badger
-
http://twitter.com/thecsmuk/status/110697962618884096 The CSM
-
http://twitter.com/ellenbroome/status/110699190186807297 Ellen Broome
-
http://twitter.com/vivizaraz/status/110703359484370944 Rosie Scott
-
http://twitter.com/creativecrip/status/110709830276218882 TheCreativeCrip
-
http://twitter.com/jameslee42/status/110716228410159104 James Lee
-
http://twitter.com/caer23/status/110720494805852161 ☠
-
Leon Wolfson
-
http://twitter.com/londoniww/status/110729227816542208 London IWW
-
http://twitter.com/tempasfujit/status/110738828393848832 people justice
-
http://twitter.com/childrensociety/status/110746170762084352 Children’s Society
-
http://twitter.com/ligomersall/status/110749702747717632 liane gomersall
-
http://twitter.com/breakupexpert1/status/110750515486396417 darren samm
-
Lucy
-
http://twitter.com/breakupexpert1/status/110766250749198336 darren samm
-
http://twitter.com/sbudden72/status/110766376704147456 Stephen Budden
-
http://twitter.com/internetspecial/status/110771440667729920 Ligia Cardenas
-
Leon Wolfson
-
http://twitter.com/postpolionews/status/110884740852219904 Chris Salter
-
http://twitter.com/elizfinncare/status/111016317779316736 Elizabeth Finn Care
-
http://twitter.com/paulnez/status/111024858548289536 Paul Nezandonyi
-
http://twitter.com/stephen_beer/status/111530755800301570 Stephen Beer
-
http://twitter.com/mcmlxxvi_ad/status/121597501114560512 .
-
http://twitter.com/andy_gilpin/status/121597613073121281 Andy Gilpin
-
http://twitter.com/houseoftwits/status/121599338198740992 House Of Twits
-
http://twitter.com/mancman10/status/121605218575192064 Ian
-
http://twitter.com/loopyb_75/status/121605681743790081 Louise
-
http://twitter.com/crowmogh/status/121609240375865346 Cookie Monster
-
http://twitter.com/christoclifford/status/121610400566480896 christine clifford
-
http://twitter.com/spsot/status/121625721763397632 Spir.Sotiropoulou
-
Richard
-
http://twitter.com/ruthyie/status/121659034725138432 Ruth Smith
-
http://twitter.com/unite785/status/121837556684947456 Brnch Sec Ruth H
-
http://twitter.com/sam_royston/status/160003097496780800 Sam Royston
-
http://www.leftfootforward.org/2012/01/exposed-six-myths-of-the-benefits-cap/ Exposed: The six myths of IDS’s benefits cap | Left Foot Forward
YouGov Tracker
ToUChstone Economic Tracker
George’s Marvellous Deficit Calculator
Most read this week
- Week Outside Westminster: Is Cameron a separatist sleeper-cell?
- "You've never had it so good" has never been so wrong: Review of The Cost of Inequality
- Tory voters trust BMA and co. over Cameron and Lansley on the NHS
- German superunion to begin negotiating for 6.5 per cent wage increase
- Building social housing would cut the housing benefit bill three times faster than a cap
Best of the web
Top issues
Left Foot Facebook
Awards & Rankings
Archive
Tag Cloud
Domestic Progressives
- A Thousand Cuts
- Alastair Campbell
- Andrew Gibson's Blog
- Anthony Painter
- Ayes To The Left
- Blackburn Labour Party
- Chartist
- Conor's Commentary
- Dave's Part
- Diary of a Benefit Scrounger
- Duncan's Economic Blog
- Follow my leaders
- Freemania
- Full Fact
- Go Fourth
- Good Animal / Bad Animal
- Guardian Politics blog
- Harry's Place
- Hopi Sen
- Institute for Government
- Intelligence Squared
- Labour and Capital
- Labour Home
- Labour List
- LabourHome
- Left Central
- Lib-Con Trick
- Liberal Conspiracy
- Liberal Democrat Voice
- LSE politics blog
- Luke's blog
- Mark Thompson Blog
- Matthew Taylor's blog
- Max Atkinson's blog
- Migrants' Rights Network
- New Statesman: free speech
- Next Left
- Nick Pearce
- OurKingdom
- Patrick Bury's blog
- Policy Critical
- Political Reboot
- Political Scrapbook
- Progress
- Red Brick
- RSA Projects
- Runnymede Trust
- Rupa Huq's Blog
- Sadie's Tavern
- Save EMA
- Shamik Das
- Slinger blog
- Tank the Tories
- Tax Research UK
- The Centre Left
- The Green Benches
- The Novocastrian
- This is my truth
- Tim McLoughlin
- Tom Harris MP
- Tom Watson MP
- Touchstone
- Touchstone TUC blog
- Young Fabians Blog







