Tories plan to suppress Trident debate
This week defence secretary Philip Hammond stated the Trident Alternatives Review would not be made public, writes Kate Hudson, general secretary of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND)
This gratuitous lack of transparency just seems bizarre and is a blow to the credibility of the government as a whole and the Liberal Democrats in particular. And it is also a blow to the prospects for a full and open debate about Britain’s real security needs.
The Lib Dems have been justifiably under fire following successive policy concessions made to the Tories as part of their bid to be in government. Yet on the question of Trident and its replacement, they have fought their corner - thanks primarily to the principles of the party grassroots.
At the Lib Dem Conference in 2010, defiant party activists, outraged at the omission of Trident from the then ongoing Strategic Defence and Security Review (pdf), tabled an emergency resolution. This won the ballot and resulted in a fiery hour on the floor with successive speakers arguing against the replacement of Britain’s nuclear weapon system.
Some argued against like-for-like replacement – which remains party policy - while others argued against Britain retaining a nuclear weapons system at all.
It was in this context that Nick Harvey’s Trident Alternatives Review, announced by Liam Fox in May, was lauded as a success for the junior partner in the coalition. Harvey, the Minister for the Armed Forces, was to hold the Tories’ insatiable appetite for Trident replacement to account and stimulate real debate with credible, evidence-based alternatives.
Just two months ago, at this year’s Lib Dem conference, Mr Harvey told a fringe meeting he was “absolutely convinced” the possibility of developing dual-use nuclear submarines was a “game-changer” for government plans. Even Ed Miliband told the Labour party conference the government had “done the right thing by commissioning a study looking at whether there are alternatives to the renewal of Trident”.
Now, in response to a question from Jeremy Corbyn, Philip Hammond has laid bare the significance of the review for the Tories:
“There are… no plans to publish either the report or the information it draws upon.”
This speaks volumes about the Conservatives’ openness to reasoned and transparent consultation over Trident replacement: it is virtually non-existent. Maybe that’s not surprising, but the really interesting issue is why. In my opinion it shows they’re scared of the debate - and that really isn’t surprising.
The majority of the population wants to see Trident scrapped; spending on Trident is a disaster for the public sector, including conventional defence; senior military figures describe it as useless; and the government itself has downgraded state-on-state nuclear attack to a tier two security threat.
When the decision on replacing Trident is due in 2016 and a general election will take place before that date, it is absolutely clear what the Tory strategy is: stifle the debate. That much at least is transparent.
See also:
• We can still fight Trident: Here’s how – Daniel Blaney, November 10th 2011
• Scrapping Trident for the savings is a losing argument; CND need realistic opposition – Andrew Gibson, November 4th 2011
• Memo to Westminster: UK “independent nuclear deterrent” not actually independent – Kate Hudson, May 27th 2011
• Government ramps up Trident work despite coalition pledge – Kate Hudson, February 18th 2011
• Coalition needs to work out where it stands on Trident – Marcus Roberts, August 4th 2010
-
Andrew
-
David Grace
-
http://twitter.com/saipang/status/139797762060455936 Sam Liu
-
http://twitter.com/clashcitywomble/status/139806631444750336 Andy Gritton
-
Wjhcoventry
-
Mr. Sensible
-
http://twitter.com/nuclearinfo/status/139827685579952128 NIS
-
http://twitter.com/luke_mas/status/139827892539494400 Luke Massey
-
http://twitter.com/tonyellis1/status/139832816732094464 Tony Ellis
-
http://twitter.com/johnrentoul/status/139834806170173440 John Rentoul
-
http://twitter.com/boab10/status/139834882451963904 Robert Ryan
-
http://twitter.com/bernardmccabe/status/139834895169093632 Ben McCabe
-
http://twitter.com/quietsilver/status/139834970993729536 Peter Garbutt
-
http://twitter.com/Newsbot9 Newsbot9
-
http://twitter.com/Newsbot9 Newsbot9
-
http://twitter.com/mcmlxxvi_ad/status/139859959037968384 Jamie
-
PB
-
http://twitter.com/labour52rose/status/140003126987075584 Alex Braithwaite
-
http://twitter.com/anne_schulthess/status/140017376921010176 Anne Schulthess
-
http://twitter.com/domlinley/status/140019086359937024 Dominic Linley
-
http://twitter.com/domlinley/status/140024442272231424 Dominic Linley
-
http://twitter.com/jamesclayton/status/140033226973519872 James Clayton
-
http://twitter.com/cnduk/status/140037833367896064 CND
-
http://twitter.com/shalom_activist/status/140038416212574208 Shalom Activist
-
http://twitter.com/peterjackharris/status/140038568386117632 Peter Harris
-
http://twitter.com/shalom_activist/status/140038976487702528 Shalom Activist
-
http://twitter.com/adpucci/status/140039819677007872 Pucci D
-
http://twitter.com/mikehitchen/status/140040840075677697 Mike Hitchen
-
http://twitter.com/jon_bartley/status/140054304814923776 Jonathan Bartley
-
http://twitter.com/yorkshirecnd/status/140090907797106688 Yorkshire CND
-
http://twitter.com/peacelinks/status/140247236264214531 David Pybus
-
http://twitter.com/blogsir/status/140265351802916864 blogsir
-
http://twitter.com/guyrope/status/140574191979216896 Pat Williams
-
http://twitter.com/bridgetmck/status/140588235385614336 bridgetmck
-
http://twitter.com/philrandal/status/140588434577301504 Phil Randal
-
http://www.leftfootforward.org/2011/11/tories-begin-trident-renewal-without-parliaments-consent/ Bypassing parliament, or: How the Tories learnt to stop worrying and renew the bomb | Left Foot Forward
-
http://twitter.com/mariaminpeace/status/142622350184153088 Mariam O’Gorman
-
http://www.leftfootforward.org/2012/01/thatcher-shut-down-debate-on-trident/ Now we know: Thatcher shut down debate on Trident. Will the coalition follow course? | Left Foot Forward
-
http://www.leftfootforward.org/2012/02/scottish-independence-would-leave-trident-dead/ Scottish independence would leave Trident dead – and the MoD don’t care | Left Foot Forward
YouGov Tracker
ToUChstone Economic Tracker
George’s Marvellous Deficit Calculator
Most read this week
- Week Outside Westminster: Is Cameron a separatist sleeper-cell?
- "You've never had it so good" has never been so wrong: Review of The Cost of Inequality
- Tory voters trust BMA and co. over Cameron and Lansley on the NHS
- German superunion to begin negotiating for 6.5 per cent wage increase
- Building social housing would cut the housing benefit bill three times faster than a cap
Best of the web
Top issues
Left Foot Facebook
Awards & Rankings
Archive
Tag Cloud
Domestic Progressives
- A Thousand Cuts
- Alastair Campbell
- Andrew Gibson's Blog
- Anthony Painter
- Ayes To The Left
- Blackburn Labour Party
- Chartist
- Conor's Commentary
- Dave's Part
- Diary of a Benefit Scrounger
- Duncan's Economic Blog
- Follow my leaders
- Freemania
- Full Fact
- Go Fourth
- Good Animal / Bad Animal
- Guardian Politics blog
- Harry's Place
- Hopi Sen
- Institute for Government
- Intelligence Squared
- Labour and Capital
- Labour Home
- Labour List
- LabourHome
- Left Central
- Lib-Con Trick
- Liberal Conspiracy
- Liberal Democrat Voice
- LSE politics blog
- Luke's blog
- Mark Thompson Blog
- Matthew Taylor's blog
- Max Atkinson's blog
- Migrants' Rights Network
- New Statesman: free speech
- Next Left
- Nick Pearce
- OurKingdom
- Patrick Bury's blog
- Policy Critical
- Political Reboot
- Political Scrapbook
- Progress
- Red Brick
- RSA Projects
- Runnymede Trust
- Rupa Huq's Blog
- Sadie's Tavern
- Save EMA
- Shamik Das
- Slinger blog
- Tank the Tories
- Tax Research UK
- The Centre Left
- The Green Benches
- The Novocastrian
- This is my truth
- Tim McLoughlin
- Tom Harris MP
- Tom Watson MP
- Touchstone
- Touchstone TUC blog
- Young Fabians Blog







