Look Left – Europe 26-1 Cameron: Britain isolated like never before


 

To receive Look Left in your inbox, as well as all LFF emails, sign up to the Left Foot Forward email service

David-Cameron-isolated-in-Europe• Britain stands on the precipice tonight, its European future in severe doubt for the first time since joining the Common Market.

In the early hours of this morning, David Cameron vetoed a deal to save the eurozone, a deal backed by all 26 other heads of government. Cameron had gambled on Europe’s leaders granting him further concessions, but his bluff was called by French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

He gambled and lost, out-thought, outmanoeuvred and out of the picture.

And the reason why he didn’t sign? To protect the City fat cats who bankroll the Tory party, to protect the financial services industry from further regulation, standing shoulder-to-shoulder with the one per cent who got us into this mess. Forget all talk about standing up for Britain’s interests, this was all about defending Cameron’s interests.

As I wrote earlier today:

“Tory dependence on the City doubled from when Cameron became Tory leader to when he became prime minister, the amount of money the Tories received from City money more than quadrupling.

“More recently, the GMB revealed 37 Tory donors with a combined fortune of more than £10 billion – linked to finance, hedge funds, private equity, property and other City activities – donated 60 per cent of the Tories’ funding in the last quarter…

“Is it any wonder then that Cameron refused to sign up to the deal, refused point blank to even countenance any scaling back of the City’s power? Who runs the government? Who’s pulling the strings? Whose money influences Tory policy? Even if he wanted to do the right thing, the gun to his head from the Tories’ biggest donors meant he couldn’t.

“On the wider political point, if Cameron believes he has sated the Eurosceptics with this ‘non!’, he can think again.

“He appears as in hoc to them – and after all, it is only with their support he became Tory leader (see here and here for the details) – as the City. And, just like a predator who scents blood, they will demand more, and more, and more, more renegotiation, more withdrawal, more grandstanding which their increasingly weak leader will be powerless to resist.”

Not even under Thatcher did the future look so bleak – and this from a coalition comprising the supposedly pro-European Liberal Democrats, whose leader has lavished praise on the prime minister today, praise echoed by his predecessor Sir Menzies Campbell. Only Vince Cable and a handful of Lib Dem MEPs (take a bow Sharon Bowles and Chris Davies) have the balls to stand up to the Tories.

As Alex Hern wrote today, if Nick Clegg wasn’t even prepared to make a stand on this, what is he prepared to speak up on?

“The question on the lips of Liberal Democrats today must be: Are there any areas on which Nick Clegg will not compromise? The common view of the Lib Dems before the election was as the party of students, civil liberties and Europe. The betrayal on the first of those three is legendary. The Lib Dems went from a manifesto committment (pdf) to “scrap unfair university tuition fees” (p33) to voting for a near tripling of those fees.

“The party hasn’t been much better on civil liberties. Their commitment to end child detention has become a commitment to end some types of child detention. They have supervised a creeping militarisation of the police, been silent on the use of kettling during peaceful protest, and voted for removing the right to see a solicitor for free after arrest.”

Ann Pettifor, meanwhile, looked at the policy implications for the financial crisis, concluding the summit is “futile” anyway, since we’re in the midst of a global, not merely eurozone, crisis – but it’s the response of the rest of Europe that should worry us most; the view across the Channel risks becoming one of “we’re better off without you anyway, we don’t care if you leave, make our day!”

The decisions taken by the euro 17 and the EU 26 will affect us, they will impact on our economy, on our lives, on our future – yet from now on it seems we will have a diminishing say on the big calls, and the more Eurosceptic our approach becomes, the more Britain withdraws into the shadows, the less of a say we will have.

The xenophobes, Little Englanders and isolationists should be careful what they wish for.

• Earlier this week, it was Cameron’s chancellor who came under attack, over the economy, and his inability to change course from his failed policies.

Writing on Left Foot Forward, shadow minister William Bain described George Osborne as “the downgraded chancellor of a deflationary government”:

“The huge error made by the chancellor on assuming office last year was to mistake a crisis of global demand, growth, and jobs being for one purely of deficit and debt. Driven by the theory that the public sector was always inefficient and public and private sector growth mutually exclusive, he launched on a grand experiment of so-called expansionary fiscal contraction.

“He must now admit that it has been the most disastrous misuse of fiscal policy in Britain since the 1930s…

“He has reduced an economy recovering at an annualised rate of 2.1 per cent a year at the end of the previous government’s period in office, to flatlining growth, which this autumn stands as the fifth lowest in the EU according to the European Commission, and lower than the eurozone average. The National Institute for Economic and Social Research (NIESR) have said this is the slowest recovery from recession in Britain in a century.

“In the Great Recession of the 1930s it took 48 months to rebuild the lost output in the economy, under this Chancellor it will be 69 months and counting…

“The country is crying out for a fairer alternative policy to this failed Tory plan that is sucking demand from our economy and hope and life from our communities. It deserves better leadership and a more optimistic vision of our country’s future.”

While Ed Balls, in a direct attack on Osborne in the Commons on Tuesday, told the House:

“In this chancellor’s Panglossian world, everything is working out just fine, Mr Deputy Speaker, but in the real world, in the real world, with the world economy darkening, with the UK now forecast to endure stagnant growth and rising unemployment this year, next year and the year after, this Panglossian chancellor is making a catastrophic error of judgement, refusing to learn the lessons of history, refusing to even understand the lessons of economics, refusing to shift to a more balanced plan, he got it wrong 18 months ago, he is getting it so, so badly wrong today, out of his depth, out of touch, isn’t it time he changed course before it is too late.”

The latest Markit Report on Jobs (pdf), meanwhile, produced more grim findings on the employment picture; it says the jobs market:

“…has been slowing since May but this slowdown has accelerated in the autumn. This is being driven by the double whammy of falling business and consumer confidence.”

With the chief executive of the Recruitment & Employment Confederation, Kevin Green, saying:

“The government has done as much as it can in the short term to remove restrictions to employment and stimulate demand. However, if confidence doesn’t return quickly to get the jobs market moving again, the government may need to take more radical action in the New Year.”

As Tony Dolphin wrote in his monthly economic update:

“The UK economy is now teetering on the brink of recession. The Office for Budget Responsibility forecasts real GDP growth of just 0.9 per cent in 2011, followed by 0.7 per cent in 2012. But in the two quarters between the third quarter of 2011 and the first of 2012 it expects no growth at all…

“More recently, the crisis in the eurozone will have affected confidence in the UK, though exports are performing better than domestic demand. Cuts in public spending and employment have also taken demand out of the economy…

“The chancellor is sticking stubbornly to his ‘Plan A’ for deficit reduction because, he argues, to not do so would risk the confidence of bond markets, and it is a fact that bond yields in the UK are close to record lows.

“It is, however, debateable whether that is due to the chancellor’s fiscal policy or to the deteriorating outlook for growth, the recent increase in the scale of quantitative easing and the vanishing likelihood of an increase in interest rates in the foreseeable future.

“Certainly, the price to pay for low bond yields appears to be almost every other economic indicator turning red.”

Also this week on the economy, watch Ed Miliband’s PMQs clash with David Cameron, and read about the SNP’s policies on infrastructure investment; Unite’s strategy to help save British manufacturing; a rebuttal of the latest Tory claims that only “the North Korea worker’s party” is in sync with Labour’s policies: and Cormac Hollingsworth on Ed Balls’s latest remarks.

• The scandal of secretive, sleazy lobbyists reared its ugly head again at the start of the week, following The Independent’s sting on the kings of anti-transparency Bell Pottinger.

Tamasin Cave, of the Alliance for Lobbying Transparency, explained on Left Foot Forward how the latest exposé leads right to Cameron’s door:

“This is reminiscent of the old Tory days of sleaze. A Conservative government at the heart of yet another lobbying scandal. Last month’s led to the resignation of the defence secretary. This one leads to the prime minister himself. One of the lobbyists caught by today’s investigation by the Independent / Bureau of Investigative Journalism, Tim Collins, is the chief lobbyist at Bell Pottinger Public Affairs.

“He is caught on camera boasting of his contacts:

“I was in the Conservative research department with David Cameron and George Osborne… I was in the Shadow Cabinet under two or three leaders, again with David Cameron and George Osborne…

“I’ve been working with people like Steve Hilton, David Cameron, George Osborne, for 20 years-plus. Edward Llewellyn, who’s the prime minister’s chief of staff, was my deputy in Central Office for a long time. Steve Hilton was my deputy in a different capacity.

“I know all these people. There is not a problem in getting the messages through to them.”

“In a speech before last year’s election, David Cameron attacked “secret corporate lobbying”; in government, Cameron’s hostility to lobbyists appears to have evaporated, along with his commitment to “shine the light of transparency on lobbying in our country”…

“It’s time his government ignored the private protests of the influence industry – whether Conservative peers, former colleagues, friends, neighbours, or wives – and listened to public demands for transparency. The longer he delays the greater the smell.”

While Labour’s John Cryer, who is putting forward a bill to regulate the industry, wrote:

“The question is this: are the claims of Tim Collins, among others, that he has access to Cameron, Osborne and Hague and their closest advisers, true or untrue? If they are true, some pretty stringent action is needed. If untrue, then the lobbyists are charlatans and all those Tory MPs who used to be lobbyists and those lobbyists who used to be MPs are conning clients out of large sums of cash.

“I agree with the prime minister that lobbying could be the next big scandal to hit British politics. But he seems to have changed his mind about the need to do anything about it…

“We all have the right to lobby and it is a vital part of democracy. But big business can pay for professionals who know their way around parliament and who can get the sort of access not available to the rest of us. They should not have the capacity to trample on the interests of ordinary citizens simply because they have cash – and went to the right school.”

And Jonny Mulligan, head of corporate, issues and environment at Unity, put the case that there are decent lobbyists out there, who, unlike the likes of Bell Pottinger, have nothing to fear from greater transparency:

“Silly, sordid, sleazy and sad is the real reaction to the Bell Pottinger lobby story. Two senior executives caught by their own hubris over-claiming, under-delivering and damaging a whole industry in the process. If proven correct these allegations throw up serious questions of ethics and standards which must be addressed.

“If proven true they make filth of the word ‘lobbying‘ and present the public with a picture of an industry filled with charlatans and snake oil salesmen…

“The time has come for change. The time has come to get all agencies to give full and recorded disclosure around their political links and work. It is the only way the public and clients will know who they are dealing with and their history. If a company wants to work for big oil, despotic regimes and cover-up child labour that is their choice. Just get it on the record so everyone knows…

“This fiasco is not good for communications agencies and has placed the industry in the media’s firing line for all the wrong reasons.”

Also on the lobbying scandal, read Alex Hern on the anger of Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales at Bell Pottinger’s reprehensible actions and their attempt to smear Gordon Brown’s sister-in-law, and from the archive, check out our report on Peter Bingle, chair of Bell Pottinger, who said “the public has no right to know who our clients are”.

Progressive of the week:

Legendary leftie Tony Benn, a man who needs no introduction. Appearing before the House of Commons Political and Constitutional Reform Committee yesterday, the inventor not only called for Cabinet proceedings to be FoI-able, he also suggested a novel idea for a post-Monarchy Head of State – making the Speaker of the Commons President of Britain.

You can see more on this revolutionary idea here.

Regressive of the week:

Tory MP for Mid Bedfordshire Nadine Dorries, who on Wednesday’s Newsnight was embarrassingly poor in putting forward the ranty, illogical, anti-European ‘no surrender’ case. (Is it any wonder that David Cameron, adopting the same approach, failed to agree a deal at the summit this morning…?!)

Former foreign secretary Sir Malcolm Rifkind, with whom she was debating, even went so far as to tell her there was a “fundamental gap with the real world” and her, adding:

“The reality is that no one country, whether it’s the United Kingdom or any other country, can simply dictate to all the rest, even the Germans can’t do that, they have to get agreement from their allies.

“So the idea that David Cameron goes to a summit and says ‘I am going to veto this summit, this agreement of everybody else we should go forward on, regardless of the implications for the European economy, regardless of the reactions of the markets, including our interest rates, as well as those in other countries unless you give me concessions on matters which are not relevant to this immediate European crisis’…

“You’ve got to be negotiating in a sensible, practical way, not just saying I demand this, I demand that, regardless of the consequences. That’s not the real world we live in.”

You can watch a full video of the exchange on Left Foot Forward here.

Evidence of the week:

The British Social Attitudes Survey 2011. On Left Foot Forward this week, we’ve had a number of reports on the findings of the survey: Declan Gaffney on child poverty, Duncan Exley on inequality, Matthew Butcher on the future of pensions, and Ann Summers on the headline findings.

The report itself can be downloaded here.

The World Outside Westminster by The Grapevine’s Chris Tarquini:

With all the concern surrounding Egypt and Libya it is easy to be pessimistic about the future of the two nations, however in the former at least a degree of stability was introduced this week with the swearing in of Egypt’s new cabinet.

Despite a government being put in place the new interior minister is Cairo’s ex-police chief Muhammad Ibrahim Yusuf and the ruling army council still has control of military affairs, leaving some observers to question how much of a step forward this really is.

***

Staying in Africa, a South African fast food chain has withdrawn an advert mocking Zimbabwean leader Robert Mugabe as ‘the last dictator standing’. Nando’s South Africa featured mocking portrayals of Mugabe alongside former infamous dictators including the likes of Idi Amin, Muammar Gaddafi and Saddam Hussein.

In mocking Mugabe as lonely (following the deaths of many of his former bloodthirsty international allies) the firm provoked angry condemnation from pro-Mugabe groups including threats to members of staff that caused the advert to be eventually pulled.

***

One dictator still in charge of his country is Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, who is under pressure from a whole range of nations including the United States and those in the Arab League.

In a bizarre interview with ABC News’s Barbara Walters, Assad displayed a degree of historical arrogance when stating:

“No government in the world kills its own people unless it is led by a crazy person.”

The President, who has overseen a brutal crackdown on pro-democracy protesters, also questioned the credibility of the United Nations, responding to Walters’s statement he has an Ambassador to the organisation with the comment “it’s a game you play”.

Whether Assad will be playing games or starring in a Nando’s advert this time next year remains to be seen.

***

Closer to home former President of the Soviet Union Mikhail Gorbachev has added his voice to concerns over the recent Russian parliamentary elections by stating:

“The country’s leaders must admit there were numerous falsification and rigging and the results do not reflect people’s will.”

The crackdown on protesters and heavily biased state TV coverage have provoked more concerns about the increasingly authoritarian nature of Vladimir Putin’s regime before next year’s Presidential election. Despite a large drop in support for Putin’s political party United Russia he is still expected to win comfortably.

How far some will go to guarantee that victory is concerning many pro-democracy and human-rights advocates.

***

To the States, and outspoken former Governor Rod Blagojevich (Democrat, Illinois) has received a 14-year prison sentence for corruption after trying to sell the Senate seat formerly held by President Obama. Despite a poor track record amongst Governors of the state regarding the rule of law, many feel ‘Blago’ has been given a particularly tough sentence.

Blagojevich served in office until 2009 but will be serving a much longer term from now on and he need not worry about approval ratings.

***

In the RealClearPolitics poll of polls current Republican flavour of the week and former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich still commands leads in three of the four early voting primary states – Iowa, South Caroline and Florida – with Mitt Romney ahead in New Hampshire, where Ginrgich is second.

Senior Romney aides are reported to be growing nervous at the prospect of a Gingrich dominated early primary season, which at the least would drastically prolong the process. Whether the ‘Newt 2012’ campaign can survive reminders of his past infidelities, scandals and lobbying as well as his often bombastic language remains to be seen.

This is all good news for President Obama, who, despite having a 41%/51% approval and disapproval rating, will be thinking Christmas has come early if the volatile Gingrich stays this far ahead of the supposedly more electable Romney.

***

Elsewhere, the Cain train has come off the rails, and as for Rick Perry, well, just look at this video, and, well, see for yourselves…

Ed Jacobs’s Week Outside Westminster:

Wales:

After weeks of wrangling and negotiations, the Welsh government finally saw its budget for next year passed thanks to the support of Liberal Democrat Assembly Members following a deal over school funding.

Assessing the politics of the situation, BBC Wales Welsh Affairs Editor, Vaughan Roderick, explained:

“From the point of view of Labour and the Liberal Democrats, nothing is more important than next May’s elections. The reasons for that is simply this: the Liberal Democrats are incredibly dependant on their local government base.

“If they lose a lot of council seats, the Welsh Lib Dems will be in deep trouble for the long term so Labour are going to do nothing to try and help Lib Dems try to save seats; the Lib Dems, on the other hand, the reason they wanted this deal is because it puts distance between them and the coalition in London.

“Having had to make a deal over the budget, Labour wants to do no more favours for the Liberal Democrats.”

First minister Carwyn Jones, meanwhile, was in a feisty mood.

Having warned it was not the time to be renegotiating the terms of the UK’s membership of the EU, Whitehall accused him of being “confrontational” as he expressed concerns the Welsh government still had not received details of how it would be affected by the autumn statement.

Outlining his concerns, the Jones said:

“The chancellor’s statement last week confirmed our deepest worries on the UK government’s approach to the economy – growth has stalled and families across Wales are being financially squeezed. It has now been eight days since the chancellor revealed his autumn statement and we are no clearer on how his plans will affect the Welsh government’s budget.”

Scotland:

The SNP appeared to have been bolstered by polling within the annual Scottish Social Attitudes survey showing 32% of Scots are now in favour of independence, up from 23 % last year. The poll also found support for all decisions being made in Scotland has increased by 15 points to 43%, while 29% support everything apart from defence and foreign affairs being devolved.

Whilst ministers were quick to argue it showed the public were on their side, Professor John Curtice of Strathclyde University warned the nationalists:

“The appetite for a more powerful parliament, including independence, has grown in the last 12 months. However, support for independence is still no higher than it has been on previous occasions since the advent of devolution.

“If the SNP are to persuade a majority of Scots to back independence they will need to convince them of the economic case for leaving the union – and that is a debate that is still to be won or lost.”

Elsewhere, the Scottish government formally unveiled its own infrastructure plan, with the Scotsman arguing:

“Now recognition of the vital importance of infrastructure is long overdue. That is why a clutch of business organisations yesterday – including CBI Scotland, the Scottish Building Federation, Scottish Chambers of Commerce and the Scottish Council for Development and Industry – all gave this announcement a broad welcome.

“Given the bleak forecasts for the economy and the near certainty of further rises in unemployment, the move of capital spending programmes to the centre of the Holyrood administration’s purpose and mission cannot come soon enough.

“However, on financial practicality, this programme founders. It is not so much realistic finance as dreamland economics. It rests on heroic assumptions that the SNP administration will secure maximum borrowing powers; that private-sector finance will cascade in and that other funding will be found from within the Holyrood budget.

“It also assumes a political commitment to these projects stretching at least 15 years ahead, covering the independence referendum and beyond. Even assuming such ambitious borrowing can be raised, the cost of that finance is not mentioned once.”

Northern Ireland:

On Left Foot Forward this week, Kevin Meagher reported on the decision by the family of murdered Belfast solicitor Patrick Finucane to launch legal proceedings against David Cameron’s refusal to establish a full independent judicial inquiry into his killing.

Outlining the purpose of the action, Finucane’s widow, Geraldine, explained:

“Not for the first time have we had to resort to legal proceedings to vindicate our legal rights. It is clear that the British government have cynically reneged on the commitment made at Weston Park. The Cameron decision is also incompatible with Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the right to life).

“We take the view that the decision not to hold a public judicial inquiry is just another obstacle which we will have to overcome. We are determined to get to the truth surrounding my husband’s murder. Our campaign will continue.”

Stormont, meanwhile, debated a motion tabled by the SDLP criticising Whitehall’s planned reforms to public sector pensions.

Opening the debate, former party leader, Mark Durkan, argued:

“The importance of this issue to public service workers and users of public services manifested itself last week when thousands stood on picket lines and attended rallies across the North. Their message was loud and clear: it is not about self-preservation; it is about fairness and justice.

“Why should ordinary, hard-working people be penalised for the reckless actions of bankers? Public servants are being unfairly targeted in a bid to solve a financial crisis that was not of their making.

“Not only is it an attack by the coalition government on their pockets, which will result in, on average, £63 a month less in take-home pay, it is also an attack on their morale and can only adversely affect the delivery of services that already have to operate in an ever increasingly difficult financial context.”

This week’s most read:

1. The perversity of Dan Hannan and the “there are no cuts” brigadeDaniel Elton

2. Cameron didn’t sign EU deal because it’s not in the interests of the one per centShamik Das

3. Ignore the Mail’s distortions, here’s what Goldsmith actually saidShamik Das

4. Latest lobbying scandal leads right to Cameron’s doorTamasin Cave, Alliance for Lobbying Transparency

5. Malcolm Rifkind: Nadine Dorries doesn’t live in the real worldAlex Hern

This entry was posted in Left Foot Forward and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
  • http://twitter.com/oldpolitics The Old Politics

    Sorry, and the evidence that this deal will save the Eurozone is where, apart from the claims of its right-wing proponents? Krugman doesn’t think it will.

    http://theoldpolitics.blogspot.com/2011/12/other-people-write-good-stuff.html for my round-up of quotations on the matter from today.

    Pettifor is correct. Cameron acted for the wrong reasons, but ultimately did the right thing.

  • Pingback: Shamik Das

  • Pingback: Orpington Labour

  • Pingback: Samuel Tarry

  • Anonymous

    Lets sign up. I like the bit about 0.5% deficits – maximum.

    That’s 20% off government spending overnight.

    What are you going to axe to be a good European?

  • Pingback: Alex Braithwaite

  • Pingback: Andrew Johnston

  • Pingback: Michael

  • Pingback: Liza Harding

  • Pingback: Jamie

  • Ed’s Talking Balls

    You’re well and truly on the wrong side of public opinion on this one. Plus ca change.

  • http://twitter.com/Newsbot9 Newsbot9

    Oh yes, because public opinion is “What the Tories think”. 27%. Not 51%. Not 100%.

    Moreover, there is a LOT of public feeling against the City. I’m sure you missed those “occupy” protests.

  • http://twitter.com/Newsbot9 Newsbot9

    Frankly, given Krugman’s record lately, it gives me more confidence that it will. Post-Noble Syndrome is a terrible thing.

  • David Lindsay

    The Swedish Social Democrats are totally opposed to the new Euro Pact, and Sweden has a hung Parliament. The Social Democratic parties of Scandinavia, please note, have a very well-policed left flank. We are talking about the parties of Ernest Bevin, Hugh Gaitskell, Douglas Jay, Peter Shore and Bryan Gould.

    The Attlee Government refused to join the European Coal and Steel Community on the grounds that it was “the blueprint for a federal state” which “the Durham miners would never wear”. Gaitskell rejected European federalism as “the end of a thousand years of history” and liable to destroy the Commonwealth. Most Labour MPs, and one Liberal, voted against Heath’s Treaty of Rome. Labour won the 1974 General Election after Enoch Powell had told his supporters to vote Labour because of Europe.

    The Parliamentary Labour Party unanimously opposed Thatcher’s Single European Act. 66 Labour MPs voted against Maastricht, including, in Bryan Gould, the only resignation from either front bench in order to do so, and outnumbering Conservative opponents by three to one. John Prescott and David Blunkett abstained rather than support Maastricht in the National Executive Committee of the Labour Party.

    Every Labour and Liberal Democrat MP, without exception, voted against the Common Agricultural and Fisheries Policies annually between 1979 and 1997. The 1997 General Election result kept the United Kingdom out of the euro, by making Gordon Brown Chancellor the Exchequer in place of Kenneth Clarke. Ed Miliband and Ed Balls were valiant in seeing off those who sought to take Britain into that ill-conceived currency while Tony Blair was Prime Minister.

    Half of the French Socialist Party successfully opposed the EU Constitution. Even before the most recent events, the euro was dealt an electoral blow in the Social Democratic heartland of North Rhine-Westphalia. Half of the UKIP vote, based on its geographical distribution, must be Old Labour or Old Liberal rather than Old Tory. The No2EU – Yes to Democracy list at the 2009 European Elections, in London included Peter Shore’s erstwhile agent, and in the North West included the immediate past Leader of the Liberal Party.

    Attlee denounced the referendum as “a device of demagogues and dictators”, a view echoed word-for-word by Thatcher as Prime Minister; it is Pythonesque that ostensible defenders of British parliamentary sovereignty and democracy demand the adoption of this foreign and deeply flawed device, rather than demanding that parliamentarians who would not simply say No to any erosion be replaced with parliamentarians who would.

    And Cameron could have dealt with 100 rebels, if there had been that many, on his own side. But not if they had marching into the division lobby behind the entire Parliamentary Labour Party. That was what would have happened. The man who has kept us out of this wretched new treaty, which makes fiscal expansion illegal, is Ed Miliband. Any chance of, so to speak, some credit?

  • RichardT

    “Left Foot Forward” berates PM for not knuckling under to treaty revisions cooked up by Angela’s CDU and Sarko’s UPM. Couldn’t make it up, etc.

  • Pingback: Guðmundur Karlsson

  • http://twitter.com/oldpolitics The Old Politics

    Krugman has been spot on. He keeps pointing out that things will get worse, and that austerity will fail. Austerity keeps failing, and things keep getting worse.

  • http://twitter.com/Newsbot9 Newsbot9

    Krugman has got the details wrong, a ten-year old kid can understand that Austerity makes things worse. Remember the Latvian wastelands!

  • Pingback: Jayne Hornby

  • Mr. Sensible

    Cameron has put party before country, and the Lib Dems couldn’t do anything about it.

    No wonder Cameron referred to just 1 party at PMQs.

  • Richard

    I reckon you’re aged 21-25. Am I right?

  • Michele Keighley

    No

  • http://twitter.com/Newsbot9 Newsbot9

    Oh yes, gotta have that financial bubble. 1% profit > 99%.

  • http://twitter.com/Newsbot9 Newsbot9

    Incorrect

  • Ed’s Talking Balls

    No Leon Wolfson/Newsbot9, I didn’t miss those protests. They were an inconvenient eyesore. But if we’re talking percentages, I’d be curious to know what proportion of the UK population pitched tents by St Pauls.

    In any event, I wasn’t talking about anti-City feeling. We should all have grave misgivings about outrageous greed and flawed capitalism (i.e. where great rewards are lavished on those who preside over huge failures).

    The point I was making is that I would be willing to bet a majority of this country is satisfied with the stance Cameron took. And I’d take on a further bet that most are bemused by Labour’s stance – criticising Cameron for “isolating” Britain while failing to say what would have been the right course of action. Typical.

  • Mike Thomas

    So let me get this right, Labour would have signed up to the new EU27 treaty which says that EU-land has to approve our budget and not one single budget can run a deficit of more than 0.5% GDP.

    So, where would Labour makes the £140bn of cuts in the budget? Come on, let’s have you, where would Labour make over 8.5% GDP cuts?

    As for the rest of this ‘article’, it’s opposition for the sake of it.

    Cameron used a veto, kept the coalition intact, saved the pensions of millions from a £40bn annual tax and also won the public over.

    And there’s Labour playing yah-boo. Silly, petulant nonsense.

  • http://twitter.com/Newsbot9 Newsbot9

    You’re wrong, as ever. We’re not part of the Eurozone. Propaganda as usual.

    He very possibly hasn’t saved the coalition – Clegg’s being squeezed, at last, by the few honest men left in the LibDems.

  • http://twitter.com/Newsbot9 Newsbot9

    Of course, dissent to you 1%ers is allways a “inconvenient eyesore”.

    And you’ve supported, unquestioningly, this government. The scale of THEIR failure shows you’re blowing smoke as usual.

    Moreover, produce a study showing your “bet” is true. Not a poll, a study. Produce ANY study on the topic of Europe’s popularity for that matter…

  • Pingback: Robert CP

  • Richard

    Actually, the first opinion poll by Survation puts a 62% approval rating on Cameron’s decision. Strange, because reading this blog, it’s all so patently wrong. Of course, that’s why we need a benign socialist collective, to make decisions for us proles. If only we’d listen to reason, what a glorious nation this could be for all. Comrade.

  • http://twitter.com/Newsbot9 Newsbot9

    Right. And I could make a poll which came out 80%+ for slapping gingers. In fact, I did during my student days, for a bet.

    How? Carefully worded questions.

    Where are your STUDIES. Not polls, studies. You can detect trends with polls (IF they keep the same question, precisely), but not numbers. Ever.

    And I’ve actually tried communism, unlike you. It sucks. I’m fully in favour of the free market. I oppose that very different beast, capitalism.

  • Richard

    You’ve ‘tried’ communism? How?

  • Richard

    I’m close though, aren’t I?

  • 13eastie

    The obvious solution to the PIIGS’ sovereign debt crises is for the UK Govt to disregard the will of its own people (again) and cede more power to unelected officials in Brussels.

    Unless we capitulate and pay whatever is asked without question, we will become “isolated” from the EU juggernaut and might not be able to share in its destruction.

  • http://twitter.com/Newsbot9 Newsbot9

    And as usual usual the far righties haven’t read what happened.

    Gogo arguing in bad faith, you’re JUST like Cameron.

  • http://twitter.com/Newsbot9 Newsbot9

    Israeli Kibbutz

  • http://twitter.com/Newsbot9 Newsbot9

    Nope!

  • http://twitter.com/Newsbot9 Newsbot9

    Your lies.

    Because we’re not a Eurozone member. Strange that you selectively missed that.

  • Pingback: How Cameron traded influence for isolation | Left Foot Forward

  • Pingback: Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland savage Cameron’s anti-EU strategy | Left Foot Forward

  • Richard

    Let’s say I want to run a fruit and veg stall in the market. Your government would encourage me to do that, but it would only allow me to keep a basic living wage, and take all rest of the profits. Essentially, is that your philosophy?

  • Richard

    That makes it even worse.

  • Pingback: 2011 will go down in history – but what does 2012 have in store? | Left Foot Forward

  • Pingback: Alexander: All Cameron’s “phantom veto” did was undermine British influence | Left Foot Forward

  • YouGov Tracker

  • Touchstone Economic Tracker

  • Best of the web

  • Archive