Following some good news for Labour in yesterday’s mayoral polls, the bad news strikes bad today, as four national polls combine to present the picture of the Conservatives maintaining a slight lead above Labour.
As Conservative Home reports, Angus Reid puts Labour at 37 per cent, two above the Conservatives at 35; Populous (£) has 37/38; YouGov reports 39/40, and ICM has the Tories storming away with 35/40. A crude average of all four has Labour losing by a quarter of a point, 37.5 to 37.75.
Although the Conservative lead isn’t as high as some would claim – focusing on the admittedly impressive ICM results – the fact that it is maintained at all should be concerning for Labour.
For almost the entirety of 2011, Labour commanded a consistent lead in the polls, only once dropping below four per cent above the Tories in the BBC’s poll of polls, directly after the local elections and AV referendum. The Conservatives overtook with their ‘EU-bump’, but Labour then reclaimed the lead for almost a month.
What makes this surge by the Conservatives so important is that, unlike their brief popularity after Cameron’s non-veto, this does not seem to be tied to any particular event, and as such it is not a valid strategy to wait it out. Labour must be extremely careful not to let these standings become the ‘new normal’.
The real concern, however, isn’t for Labour as a whole, but for Ed Miliband in particular. Insofar as there was a cause for the change, it seems to have been his disastrous week beginning with Diane Abbott’s ‘divide and rule’ tweet, and going downhill from there.
Indeed, the Times/Populous poll (£) backs this up:
The proportion of voters who say they “find it difficult to imagine Ed Miliband running the country as Prime Minister” has risen from 63 per cent in September to 68 per cent now.
Amongst Labour supporters, this has jumped from 49 per cent in September to 59 per cent now. Just 37 per cent say they disagree with this statement.
Nearly 4 out of 10 (38 per cent) [who couldn't imagine him as PM] selected the option that he was “not really up to the job of Prime Minister”, 33 per cent said it was because they “did not know enough about Ed Miliband to judge what he might be like” while 9 per cent said it was because “Labour are unlikely to win the next election”.
Ultimately, however, it takes time – and unfortunately, hindsight – to distinguish between genuine patterns and random noise in polls.
Meanwhile, Ed and Labour must not allow their poor performance to become a self-fulfilling prophecy; all too often, bad polls lead to stories about what a party is doing wrong, which leads to a focus on their negatives, which leads to yet worse polls. In the short term, they have a chance to turn it around, and they must move fast if they are to.
• Ken stays ahead as Boris doubles-down on blaming young people for youth unemployment – Alex Hern, January 23rd 2012
• Ken pulls ahead of “increasingly out of touch” Boris – Shamik Das, January 19th 2012
• Sunday Times stoop to new low with poll asking if Ed Miliband is “too ugly” – Will Straw, January 15th 2012
• Poll worry for Cameron on eve of conference speech – Shamik Das, October 5th 2011
• Miliband shooting par for leader of the opposition – no more, no less – Alex Hern, September 23rd 2011