Mark Thompson reveals new evidence that the government is focusing on dogma over harm reduction, as they explicitly reject a campaign which would reduce harm.
Mark Thompson is a Liberal Democrat blogger who blogs at the Mark Reckons blog
In engaging with the debate about drugs policy with politicians and ministers you regularly find that they will claim there is no contradiction between encouraging abstinence of substances and reducing harm. They insist that their policies are compatible with harm reduction.
I have come across evidence that this simply is not true.
The UK Cannabis Internet Activist website has been trying to engage the Department of Health in a discussion about running a campaign designed to reduce harm caused currently by the propensity of those taking cannabis to smoke it with tobacco. They have launched a campaign called Tokepure which encourages people to not do this and is trying to educate people about the issue.
Predictably though, the government is not interested in helping with this campaign.
Derek Williams of UKCIA wrote to Anne Milton the responsible minister via his MP and received the standard templated reply explaining the government’s position on drugs and explaining that there is not to be a campaign run from government along these lines.
Mr Williams replied, explaining in his own words:
“…The very obvious reasons why getting cannabis users to drop the tobacco would be a good idea, supporting my case with reference not only to population studies of cannabis users, but also to information put out by her own department.”
The reply Mr Williams received from Ms Milton included this snippet which is instructive:
If, as Mr Williams suggests, we were to advocate that people smoke cannabis without tobacco, we would be … putting people at risk of harm.
This seems quite bizarre. Mr Williams went out of his way in his correspondence to make it clear that he would be happy with a campaign that simply told people not to mix tobacco with cannabis, not a change in government policy to cannabis use itself which Mr Williams fully accepts can itself be harmful. His point is, it is more harmful still to use cannabis with tobacco.
Further correspondence yielded a further reply from Ms Milton:
Cannabis can damage both physical and mental health and it would be irresponsible for anyone to suggest there is a “safe” way to smoke cannabis.
This would appear to completely miss the point. Mr Williams is not saying smoking cannabis without tobacco is safe. He is saying it is safer. Surely this is a trivial and obvious point?
The thinking behind her position becomes clear later in this second reply though:
The Tokepure argument is clear – that people should be advised that smoking cannabis and tobacco together is more harmful than smoking cannabis without tobacco – as is the government’s position – that cannabis and tobacco, whether smoked together or separately are dangerous and should not be used.
The thinking however is hopelessly muddled. The two things are not contradictory. Both cannabis and tobacco can be harmful (or in the minister’s words “dangerous”). That does not negate the fact that smoking them together is more harmful.
Sadly what this reveals about government drug policy and its approach to harm reduction is that it is driven by dogma.
For all the claims that its policies are compatible with harm reduction this is shown to be untrue here. Smoking cannabis with tobacco is more harmful than just taking cannabis. That is a fact. Yet because of the “just say no” approach the government takes it refuses to acknowledge this for fear of “the message it would send out”.
It is worth bearing this in mind the next time a minister claims they are in favour of reducing harms caused by drugs. Their record suggests that in practice this is not the case.
You can read Mr Williams’s full exchange with Ms Milton and his thoughts on it here.
See also:
• The current approach to drugs has gone to pot – Mike Morgan-Giles, November 19th 2011
• Legalising drugs would help reduce the deficit – Stuart Rodger, August 6th 2011
• On drugs policy, the government should do what the evidence tells them – Dr Michael Shiner, June 5th 2011
• Johnson defends Government drugs policy – Shamik Das, November 2nd 2009
• Government should listen to its advisers on drugs policy – Mark Thompson, September 14th 2009
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
24 Responses to “The government’s drug policy favours dogma over harm reduction”
Thomas Hobbes
Do you not understand how ‘denormalisation’ works yet? It has never been about facts, statistical evidence or health reduction. It is always and everywhere about control.
For any of the prohibitionists to admit to any weakness, as “not safe, but safer” would be viewed, would be a retrograde step in the relentless march towards a British Standard Human.
You only notice now it applies to something you approve of, but smokers, drinkers, the slightly overweight have all cottoned on to the process. The madness of salt denormalisation is that it might actually succeed and people will start dying from the consequences of not consuming salt. Health reduction in the extreme.
Propensity
Govt like bunny in spotlight of drug data @leftfootfwd: Government’s drug policy favours dogma over harm reduction http://t.co/qZucadHq
rvnfthr8
#UK : The government ’s drug policy favours dogma over harm reduction http://t.co/LXJggnCL
BevR
The government's drug policy favours dogma over harm reduction, writes @markreckons: http://t.co/aoIiX6ZD
weed
Govt like bunny in spotlight of drug data @leftfootfwd: Government’s drug policy favours dogma over harm reduction http://t.co/qZucadHq