Fresh news of Barclays and other high street banks misselling financial products draws condemnation from none other than the governor of the Bank of England.
.
This week’s news that Barclays Bank spent several years trying to manipulate the London Interbank Offered Rate, or Libor – the average borrowing rate for banks, calculated each day and used to price innumerable financial services worldwide – has been greeted with widespread disgust.
Yesterday, George Osborne described it as “a shocking indictment of culture at banks like Barclays in run up to the financial crisis“, while Ed Miliband called for criminal prosecutions. Barclays’ embattled CEO, Bob Diamond, has faced fresh calls for his resignation.
Today bought fresh news of Barclays’ malpractice, with the FSA instructing them and three other high street banks (Lloyds, RBS and HSBC) to pay redress to a large number of small business customers that were missold interest rate swaps.
Meanwhile, the latest voice to join the chorus of outrage over the banking sector’s behaviour is none other than that of Mervyn King, Governor of the Bank of England.
Earlier today, at a press conference to mark the launch of the Bank of England’s Financial Stability Report, King refused to endorse Diamond as a fit and proper person to run a bank. “There’s something very wrong with the UK banking industry“, he said, “and we need to put it right.”
“It is time to do something about the banking system…Many people in the banking industry are hard-working and feel badly let down by some of their colleagues and leaders. It goes to the culture and the structure of banks – the excessive compensation, the shoddy treatment of customers, the deceitful manipulation of a key interest rate, and today news of yet another mis-selling scandal.”
• Miliband: Time for prosecutions, proper regulation and an end to the “casino culture” 28 June 2012
• Osborne, Barclays, the Cayman Islands and tax avoidance 17 April 2012
• The warnings about Barclays’s tax-dodging greed were there in 2008 28 February 2012
• Transparency, accountability, responsibility: Miliband’s “one nation banking” principles 3 February 2012
• The government has the power to stop Hester’s bonus, they just don’t want to 27 January 2012
The logical conclusion to all of this is that we need a Leveson inquiry for the banking sector. Yet King denies that such a thing is necessary, as does David Cameron.
How many more revelations and scandals will it take for that position to become untenable?
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
21 Responses to “After the Barclays Libor scandal, how long must we wait for a public inquiry?”
POLITICAL THOUGHTS
After the Barclays Libor scandal, how long must we wait for a public inquiry? http://t.co/s6ORjiaY by @BenPhillips1989
John Finucane
Left Foot Forward – After the Barclays Libor scandal, how long must we wait for a public inquiry? http://t.co/gZsqj6wC
joseph edwards
After the Barclays Libor scandal, how long must we wait for a public inquiry? http://t.co/s6ORjiaY by @BenPhillips1989
KMJ
RT @leftfootfwd: After the Barclays Libor scandal, how long must we wait for a public inquiry? http://t.co/xvhqXz7o by @BenPhillips1989
Political Planet
After the Barclays Libor scandal, how long must we wait for a public inquiry?: Fresh news of Barclays and other … http://t.co/Yc1nPKwC