The mid-term report, and the report on that report


This afternoon saw a reaffirmation of coalition vows from the Conservatives and Lib Dems, along with a host of statements of values, all outlined in their ‘mid-term report’.

David-Cameron-and-Nick-CleggInevitably, Labour has retorted with a document of their own outlining the ways in which they believe the coalition to have failed.

Differences between government and opposition appear stark when looking at certain areas; one such area is the much feted deficit. In the government’s document they outline the section by discussing the debt left to them by the previous Labour government and making hay about their having reduced the deficit by a quarter.

Labour counter this with their assertion that borrowing under the Tories (and they make it clear that the government is a Tory one in their eyes) has gone up by 10%.

On jobs and welfare, there is, unsurprisingly, disparity in the views on display; Labour accuses the government’s work programme of only helping two in a hundred find employment. Meanwhile, in the mid-term report, the same work programme is hailed as a success and as the most ambitious ever seen in Britain.

In sections on the NHS, both documents directly contradict each other. The coalition claims to have increased NHS spending, in real terms, for two years in a row. Labour, conversely, claims the government has cut spending for two years in a row; they also claim that the government has spent £1 billion on making NHS staff redundant.

On schools, the picture is much the same. The government trumpet their controversial ‘free school’ system, saying there are 102 to open this year. Labour instead lambastes the government for their use of free schools saying that they are failing and being propped up by “millions” and that the Department for Education is not saying how many proposals there are.

Between these two documents we are left with a picture not any different to that before the mid-term report. The government spent 52 pages discussing what they have done and why it is right that they carry on and Labour spent 17 pages criticising government policies; this article only presents a flavour of the disagreements between the two documents, but it is reasonably clear from these example that there have been no large developments or surprises in party lines, coalition balances or policy.

What it does demonstrate though is a milestone that many though that the coalition may not reach and that Labour are dialing up the rhetoric ready for the long pre-election slog with their slogan; “Out of touch. Unfair. Incompetent”.

This entry was posted in Left Foot Forward and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
  • Sgt, Barnes

    The use of the word “unfair” would be limp wristed and whiny, i’d be cringing if I was a Labour supporter and that was part of a campaign slogan.

  • robertcp

    The Labour line on the deficit worries me, because the deficit has come down since 2010 and increased borrowing was inevitable. A more sensible criticism would be that the coalition’s plan for deficit reduction was unrealistic, which caused the second recession and prevented the deficit falling in this financial year. The government seems to have learnt its lesson, so the economy will probably grow modestly during the next two years and the deficit will fall to something close to what was planned for by Alistair Darling. The coalition will then be able to argue that it has implemented the Darling Plan!

  • Newsbot9

    True, murderous is correct.

  • Newsbot9

    No, killing off the poor is nowhere in the Labour plan, oddly enough. The debt continues to soar, as your Coalition have made no serious efforts to reduce it whatsoever, and they continue to suck billions out of the economy with cuts to things with a multiple WELL above 1.0.

    The economy is going to keep falling, of course, as your death cycle plan A pushes on.

  • YouGov Tracker

  • Touchstone Economic Tracker

  • Best of the web

  • Archive