The UK is in the midst of an occupational pensions revolution as 10 million people are automatically enrolled in a workplace pension for the first time.
By shadow pensions minister Gregg McClymont MP
The UK is in the midst of an occupational pensions revolution as 10 million people are automatically enrolled in a workplace pension for the first time.
Labour started this revolution. The last government was the author of auto-enrolment and began the process of exposing rip off pension charges by introducing both stakeholder pensions and the National Employment Savings Trust (NEST) a low cost not-for-profit independent pension provider.
Auto-enrolment is underway but the success of this revolution is not assured. The government must make it so. After all, the government’s state pension reform is predicated on the assumption that workplace pension saving will plug the gap in pensioner income that will be created by the flat rate state pension.
So getting auto-enrolment right is crucial. While the early evidence from larger employers auto-enrolling staff is encouraging, this tells us little about what will happen when SMEs begin auto-enrolling. Lacking the muscle, resources and pensions expertise of corporate blue chips the danger is that SME employees – the vast majority of the UK workforce – don’t get high quality low cost workplace pensions.
We must avoid a situation where pension pots are eaten away by costs and charges which boost the profits of pension providers, asset managers and other financial intermediaries of the kind the Kay review identified.
Employees will opt out if they do not think the new workplace pensions are value for money.
The current occupational pensions market is flawed. It does not operate like a normal market in which the consumer exercises choice. After all, it’s the employer not the employee who chooses the pension plan and employers are – especially in the SME sector – unequipped to negotiate the complexities of pension provision for their staff.
This asymmetry has given rise to a number of practices which can siphon away the value of savings in contract-based schemes: high charges, high transaction costs, passive member penalties, exit fees, consultancy charges and annuity rates which fail to match the open market rate. These can and should be tackled by government. It could do so by legislating directly. It could do so more efficiently by empowering a single regulator held to account by parliament to ensure that abusive practices are ruled out of court.
Regulation is part of the answer. But even more important is to change the incentives of the providers themselves. There are two ways to do this and realign market incentives.
First, the government should impose a legal requirement that all pension scheme providers must prioritise the interests of savers above those of shareholders. This duty should be policed by trustees who would have a duty to ensure that the pension scheme providers operate in line with a new legal requirement.
Second, the government should free-up NEST. NEST is managed by independent trustees. It’s existence and the pro-saver approach it has adopted has forced private providers to improve their performance to a degree. However, its effect is limited because of restrictions on its activity. Those restrictions should now be lifted.
Third, the government should also recognize that scale is important in ensuring that pension schemes and their trustees have the ability to negotiate the best terms with financial intermediaries. Changing rules and empowering the regulator to encourage scale has been a focus of the Cooper Review’s recent Australian reforms which are designed to benefit the saver.
We in the Labour Party did not believe that the government would willingly tackle vested interests and embark on these vital reforms. This is why we called for the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) investigation into the workplace pensions market underway currently and why it is crucial for savers that the government complete the workplace pension revolution which Labour began.
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
4 Responses to “The government must finish the pension revolution which Labour began”
OldLb
What revoulution is that?
When you were in power you increased the government pension debts at 734 bn a year.
http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171766_263808.pdf
That was hidden off the books.
As we now know, people who voultarily paid extra NI have lost out because the payouts have been cut.
That has been planned for some time.
Hiding the debts off the books, exposing people to risk or actual loss is fraud.
It’s section 2 and 3 of the 2006 fraud act
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/35/section/2
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/35/section/3
Then you have the nerve to complain out rip of charges.
The DWP costs 4 billion a year and administers 80 bn in payouts. 5% charges per annum. Makes the rip of charges in the private sector look like charity.
Cole
Oh dear, off he goes again.
LB
Still not prepared to provide alternative figures are you?
Just ad hominien attacks, as the basis of a discussion, rather than debate any points.
Do they or don’t they owe people a pension?
1. State pension?
2 .State second pension?
3. Civil service pension?
Or will the state take the banking approach. e.g. Because the treasury has screwed up, all civil servants must be responsible.
Or because we have muslim terrorists all muslims are terrorists.
Or because some migrants are good for the UK, all migrants must be good (terrorists included).
perfectinvesting
BitCurrencyTrade Pay 45.8% Interest daily for 5 days
BitCurrencyTrade is a successful group of private investment company who have made money through prudent investments in the finance industry on a worldwide basis for 5 years. The strategy of our professionals is based on monitoring and analyzing historical and statistical data, research of currency rate fluctuations and risk management of FOREX. Your investment are managed by a highly qualified and experienced team of investment professionals, committed to providing superior investment returns.
We have 2 types of investing. Daily and periodic. Daily plan starts from 45.8% daily for 5 days. Periodic plan starts from 357% after 5 days. For more details please go to invest page.
Invest Now
http://www.bitcurrencytrade.com/?ref=payinghyips
Investment Insurance
http://www.payinghyiponline.com/bitcurrencytrade.html