Cormac Hollingsworth explains how the warning signs for Barclays’s tax-dodging were there back in 2008.
As Lord Wood said today:
“The occupy protest against corporate greed in London was disbanded on the day Barclays were revealed to have used a loophole to avoid paying £500 million tax.”
Cormac Hollingsworth explains the background behind the Barclays deal…
Bob Diamond’s Barclays Bank has been caught by the UK tax man trying to help two clients avoid tax on half a billion pounds, it was revealed by the FT yesterday (£).
The tax authorities described the schemes as “highly abusive” and HMRC are changing the law to close the loopholes exposed.
Bob Diamond, the man who a year ago told the Treasury Select Committee that “the time for banker remorse is over,” is clearly taking this beyond the boundaries of acceptability.
As Richard Murphy has blogged last night, Barclays had signed a code of conduct on taxation that these transactions explicitly looked to dodge.
But the warnings were there, back in the financial crisis.
Barclays shareholders were up in arms at the deal that Bob Diamond cut with the Qatari and Abu Dhabi states that bailed out Barclays bank to the order of £7 billion. The deal paid 14 per cent, while a comparable deal from the UK government was a 12 per cent coupon (for example, that’s what RBS had to pay).
There had to be a reason why Barclays board preferred to pay the higher coupon to avoid the UK becoming its shareholder, and that reason is now clear. With the UK government as their shareholder, their highly abusive tax deals would have been stopped.
See also:
• ECB bailing out British banks exposes coalition’s finance failure – Cormac Hollingsworth, February 27th 2012
• Transparency, accountability, responsibility: Miliband’s “one nation banking” principles – Shamik Das, February 3rd 2012
• A word for 2012: Liquidation – Cormac Hollingsworth, January 4th 2012
• Implementing Vickers won’t stop the next crisis – Josh Ryan Collins, December 20th 2011
• The challenges for Labour in developing a credible banking regulation policy – Matthew Pitt, September 2nd 2011
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
17 Responses to “The warnings about Barclays’s tax-dodging greed were there in 2008”
Anonymous
So not a peep about the tax evasion on Ken Livingstone. Ah yes, tax evasion is just for non socialists.
The real problem with this is the message it sends. It is that the government will change the law when its suits it, and retrospectively.
The good thing, is that we can now change the law to make the Labour party and all its members retrospectively liable for the mess left.
How are you going to pay your share of 150 bn a year?
Ah yes, not a peep of complaint.
It sends the message, business is not welcome in the UK. Incorporate elsewhere where the law isn’t arbitrarily changed to extract more cash.
Shamik Das
The warnings about Barclays’s tax-dodging greed were there in 2008, writes @CormacHolly: http://t.co/noKu3HWI
Soupy One
The warnings about Barclays’s tax-dodging greed were there in 2008, writes @CormacHolly: http://t.co/noKu3HWI
Steve Bainbridge
RT frm earlier: The warnings about Barclays’s tax-dodging greed were there in 2008, writes @CormacHolly: http://t.co/noKu3HWI
Stephen Scullion
RT frm earlier: The warnings about Barclays’s tax-dodging greed were there in 2008, writes @CormacHolly: http://t.co/noKu3HWI